Christopher Clark's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to Christopher Clark?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
CHRISTOPHER CLARK FROM CUMNOCK SENTENCED FOR CHILD PORNOGRAPHY OFFENSES
In a case that has shocked the local community of Cumnock, Christopher Clark, a 32-year-old resident of Atholl House, was found guilty of possessing and viewing illegal images involving children. The incident came to light after police conducted an unannounced visit to Clark’s home on May 10, 2017, during which they seized his Samsung S6 Edge mobile phone. The device revealed the presence of 19 indecent photographs depicting children aged between nine and 11, which had been stored on a Dropbox account.Authorities confirmed that the images fell under Category C indecent images of children, a classification indicating a significant level of abuse material. The police investigation was initiated after the officers discovered the disturbing content on Clark’s phone, raising serious concerns about his conduct and the safety of minors.
During a police interview held at Kilmarnock Police Station on August 1, 2017, Clark admitted to being the sole owner of the mobile device. He initially claimed that he only viewed regular adult pornography and insisted that the files in question were downloaded by mistake. Clark further stated that he believed he had deleted the images, although they remained accessible on his device.
Clark appeared before Sheriff Desmond Leslie at Ayr Sheriff Court last week to face the charges. The court heard that Clark had pleaded guilty to the offense of taking or permitting the taking of indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs of children. However, he entered a plea of not guilty to a separate charge of possession of such images, which the prosecution accepted.
In delivering his judgment, Sheriff Leslie emphasized that Clark was already subject to an existing order, and since the offense occurred prior to that order, he would be dealt with through a financial penalty. Clark was fined £500 and was also ordered to register as a sex offender for a period of five years. The court’s decision underscores the seriousness with which such offenses are treated and highlights ongoing efforts to protect children from exploitation and abuse.