SUSAN HARLING FROM HUDDERSFIELD BREACHES COURT ORDER ON ANIMAL CARE
In a recent case brought before the courts, Susan Harling, a resident of Spring Grove Street in Huddersfield, was found to have violated a court-imposed restriction concerning the keeping of animals.
Born around 1959, Harling’s legal troubles stem from a court order issued in June 2016, which explicitly prohibited her from possessing or participating in the care of animals.
Despite this ban, Harling was found to have breached the court's directive, leading to further legal consequences.
The court decided to discharge her conditionally for a period of 12 months, meaning she would be monitored and required to adhere strictly to the conditions set forth.
Additionally, she was handed a ban that prevents her from keeping or being involved in the care of animals for a duration of four years.
As part of her sentencing, Harling was ordered to pay a surcharge of £20, along with costs amounting to £30.
These financial penalties are standard in such cases and serve as a punitive measure to reinforce the seriousness of her breach.
It is important to note that Harling has a prior conviction related to animal cruelty, which was recorded in June 2016.
At that time, she was ordered to pay costs of £300 and was banned from keeping animals for a period of five years.
That ban, however, expired in 2021, and the current breach indicates a disregard for the legal restrictions previously imposed.
This case highlights ongoing concerns about animal welfare and the importance of adhering to court orders designed to protect vulnerable animals.
The authorities continue to enforce these regulations to prevent cruelty and ensure responsible pet ownership in Huddersfield and beyond.
This is a probabilistic continent or country-group signal from public name datasets. It is not proof of nationality, ethnicity or personal background.
Likely region signal
UK
Country
from United Kingdom
- based on surname
53.2%
confidence
First-name region
UK
United States
43.9%
Surname region
UK
United Kingdom
53.2%
Court Outcome
Conviction and Sentencing Details
Sentenced
Detected legal outcome
om keeping or being involved in the care of animals for a duration of four years.As part of her sentencing, Harling was ordered to pay a surcharge of 20, along with costs amounting to 30. These financial penalties are standard in such ca...
Fine or payment
As part of her sentencing, Harling was ordered to pay a surcharge of 20, along with costs amounting to 30
Fine or payment
five years
At that time, she was ordered to pay costs of 300 and was banned from keeping animals for a period of five years
Disqualification or ban
five years
At that time, she was ordered to pay costs of 300 and was banned from keeping animals for a period of five years