Rodney Whitchelo's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to Rodney Whitchelo?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
RODNEY WHITCHELO'S HORRIFIC BABY FOOD POISONING IN HORNCHURCH: EARLY RELEASE SPARKS OUTRAGE
In November 1998, a disturbing case of child endangerment and criminal blackmail unfolded that shocked the nation and left a trail of devastation in Hornchurch. The perpetrator, Rodney Whitchelo, a former police officer, orchestrated a malicious campaign that targeted innocent babies by contaminating their food with dangerous substances, in a bid to extort millions of pounds from major food corporations such as Heinz and Pedigree.Ten years prior, Whitchelo, then aged 40, carried out a series of heinous acts that resulted in five infants being hospitalized after their jars of baby food were deliberately poisoned. His method was both cruel and calculated: he would purchase jars of baby food, inject them with caustic acid and broken razor blades, and then return them to supermarket shelves, all in an effort to threaten and blackmail the food giants for a staggering sum of four million pounds.
The severity of his actions was uncovered after a comprehensive police investigation that spanned the entire country. The operation, which cost approximately three million pounds and involved over 200 officers monitoring cashpoints across Britain, eventually led to Whitchelo’s arrest. Despite his efforts to deny guilt, claiming he was set up by fellow officers, evidence against him was overwhelming. One particularly horrifying discovery was a jar of Heinz cauliflower baby food containing enough poison to kill 27 children, a testament to the danger posed by his campaign.
In 1990, Whitchelo was tried at the Old Bailey, where Judge Nina Lowry sentenced him to 17 years in prison. During the trial, Whitchelo refused to admit guilt and instead claimed he had been falsely accused. His arrogance and refusal to accept responsibility only added to the horror of his crimes. His blackmail letters and actions revealed a deeply disturbed individual with a capacity for evil.
Now, at the age of 50, Whitchelo has served nearly nine years behind bars. Recently, it was revealed that he was released from prison three months ago, eight years earlier than his original sentence. His release has sparked outrage among the victims’ families and the public. Whitchelo currently resides in Hornchurch, Essex, living with his elderly mother, May. From his home, he expressed a desire for forgiveness, stating, “I think I have atoned. I would condemn anyone who commits such crimes. It is dreadfully upsetting and I am very, very sorry. How do you apologise to a nation?”
However, his attempt to distance himself from his past actions has been met with anger and disbelief. Helen Coppock, whose nine-month-old daughter Victoria was hospitalized after eating food laced with razor blade fragments, was particularly incensed. She described Whitchelo as an “evil man” and accused him of being cold and warped, capable of deliberately harming a baby without remorse. “He is an evil man,” she said from her home near Oxford. “Anyone who can sit at home and cut up a razor blade, knowing it will cut a baby, is warped. I don’t expect he has got any remorse whatsoever. He was an arrogant man who looked at me like I was a piece of dirt during the trial.”
Despite her anger, Helen admitted that after ten years, her feelings of rage have diminished, and she no longer fears Whitchelo. “I wouldn’t be frightened of him now,” she added, “but I wouldn’t want to give him the satisfaction of knowing how much he had got to me.”
In interviews from his home, Whitchelo expressed confusion about his motives, claiming he has tried to explain his actions to authorities. He insisted that he is now trying to lead an honest life, running his own computer business and avoiding publicity. When asked how he could assure the public he would not reoffend, he responded, “You can only do it through behaviour. I know I am not going to do anything like that, but my saying so doesn’t necessarily satisfy the public.” His words have done little to quell the outrage, especially among those who suffered directly from his crimes.