John Davies's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to John Davies?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
JOHN DAVIES FROM BEWDLEY AND ROCK CAUGHT WITH CHILD PORNOGRAPHY IN SHOCKING CASE
In a disturbing case that has shocked the communities of Bewdley and Rock, John Davies, a 51-year-old resident, was found guilty of downloading and possessing child pornography. The incident came to light after police executed a search warrant at his residence on Rectory Lane, Rock, near Bewdley, in the year 2010.During the police raid, authorities discovered that Davies had stored a total of 29 images on his computer. Among these, three were classified at the most severe level of depravity, indicating explicit and highly disturbing content involving minors. Prosecutor Mr. Simon Phillips detailed that the images were created in 2006, and Davies had paid for them using a credit card, which linked him directly to the illegal material.
The case was brought before Worcester Crown Court, where Judge John Cavell addressed the seriousness of the offense. He warned Davies that such actions could have resulted in a prison sentence, emphasizing the gravity of possessing and viewing child exploitation images.
Davies admitted to ten counts of making indecent images of children, a plea that acknowledged his involvement in the creation and possession of the illicit material. The court considered the evidence and the nature of the images, which prompted a stern judicial response.
As part of his sentencing, Davies was handed a three-year community order. He is required to participate in a sex therapy program aimed at addressing underlying issues related to his behavior. Additionally, he is prohibited from using computers or any digital devices that could facilitate access to such material. The court also ordered him to refrain from any contact with children under the age of 18 and imposed a financial penalty of £1,200 to cover court costs.
During the proceedings, Miss Abigail Nixon, representing Davies, argued that his involvement was limited, stating that he had only downloaded a small amount of material. Nonetheless, the court's decision reflected the serious nature of the offense and the need for ongoing supervision and rehabilitation.