Eddie Lillis's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to Eddie Lillis?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
EDDIE LILLIS SHOCKING CHILD ABUSE IN LIMERICK: EX-DEFENCE FORCES MEMBER SENTENCED TO 3.5 YEARS
Eddie Lillis, a retired member of the Defence Forces residing in Shannonvale, Old Cratloe Road, Limerick, has been publicly identified and sentenced to three and a half years in prison after a harrowing trial at Limerick Circuit Criminal Court. The 63-year-old man was convicted of sexually abusing two young girls during the 1980s, acts that have left deep scars on his victims and the community alike.Throughout the proceedings, Lillis denied all allegations of sexual misconduct. Despite his denial, the court found sufficient evidence to convict him on four of the five charges brought against him. The jury was unable to reach a verdict on the fifth count. Judge Colin Daly, who presided over the case, lifted a previous court order that had restricted media from naming Lillis, allowing his identity to be publicly disclosed.
The court heard that shortly after the first assault, known as Girl A, occurred, the young girl confided in her mother about the abuse. She subsequently provided a formal statement to Gardaí. However, at that time, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) determined that there was insufficient evidence to proceed with charges against Lillis. Despite this setback, Lillis continued his abusive behavior, targeting a second girl, referred to as Girl B.
It was only in 2020, after Girl A made a renewed complaint and Gardaí received a separate report from Girl B, that authorities reopened the investigation. The DPP then ordered Lillis to stand trial, leading to his eventual conviction. During the court proceedings, Lillis was supported by some members of his family. Through his legal representative, he expressed acceptance of the jury’s verdict, despite contesting the charges.
Girl A, who was just days away from her First Holy Communion when the abuse occurred, described the profound impact the trauma had on her. She stated that the “heinous” acts committed by Lillis transformed her from a “carefree, innocent six-year-old girl” into someone overwhelmed by confusion and fear. She recounted that the man who was supposed to protect her, a figure of trust in her community, instead exploited her innocence and vulnerability.
She vividly recalled her first encounter with Lillis’s genitalia, describing the experience as disgusting and the smell as unforgettable, leaving her with lasting feelings of sickness into adulthood. Her testimony underscored the betrayal she felt, emphasizing that her abuser’s actions had a devastating effect on her mental health and sense of safety.
Girl A expressed her relief that her allegations were finally taken seriously by the DPP and that justice was served. She also highlighted the emotional toll on her family, who felt helpless during the process. Her motivation for coming forward was rooted in a desire to protect other children from similar harm, and she emphasized that her courage was driven by the hope of preventing future abuse.
Girl B, who also suffered abuse at Lillis’s hands, described how the trauma had “warped” her childhood. Despite undergoing extensive therapy, she revealed that the psychological scars remain. Her testimony reflected ongoing fears for her own daughter and for all young girls, citing men like Edward Lillis as the reason for her vigilance and concern.
She criticized Lillis for maintaining his innocence throughout the trial and for causing additional trauma to her family. She noted that Lillis had shown no remorse for his actions. Both victims chose not to be publicly identified but supported the decision to lift reporting restrictions on Lillis’s identity.
In sentencing, Judge Daly condemned Lillis for abusing his position of trust within the community to carry out his heinous acts. The judge emphasized that Lillis, a married father of three, exploited his role to prey on vulnerable children, causing irreparable harm. The court’s decision to imprison him reflects the severity of his crimes and the importance of safeguarding children from predators like him.