CONNOR BUCKLEY BUSTED IN BICESTER FOR SEX OFFENDER ORDER VIOLATION
In October 2018, Connor Buckley, a 22-year-old resident of Kestrel Way in Bicester, found himself in legal trouble after breaching a court-ordered restriction related to his status as a sex offender.
Buckley was charged with failing to adhere to the strict notification requirements mandated by the sex offenders register.
Specifically, he admitted to two counts of not informing authorities about changes to his residential address, which he was legally obliged to do on March 19 and March 22 of that year.
These violations are considered serious breaches of the conditions set forth to monitor and manage sex offenders within the community.
Buckley's failure to notify authorities of his change of address posed potential risks to public safety and undermined the legal framework designed to keep communities secure.
During the court proceedings, Buckley accepted responsibility for his actions.
As a result, he was ordered to pay a total fine of £300.
Additionally, he was required to contribute a victim surcharge of £30 and cover court costs amounting to £85.
These penalties serve as a reminder of the importance of compliance with legal obligations for registered sex offenders and the consequences of neglecting such duties.
This is a probabilistic continent or country-group signal from public name datasets. It is not proof of nationality, ethnicity or personal background.
Likely region signal
UK
Country
from United Kingdom
- based on first and surname
50.1%
confidence
First-name region
UK
United Kingdom
57.3%
Surname region
UK
United Kingdom
42.9%
Court Outcome
Conviction and Sentencing Details
Sentenced
Detected legal outcome
communities secure. During the court proceedings, Buckley accepted responsibility for his actions. As a result, he was ordered to pay a total fine of 300. Additionally, he was required to contribute a victim surcharge of 30 and cover cou...
Fine or payment
As a result, he was ordered to pay a total fine of 300
Fine or payment
Additionally, he was required to contribute a victim surcharge of 30 and cover court costs amounting to 85