Theresa Dixon's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to Theresa Dixon?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
THERESA DIXON FROM PRENTON SENTENCED FOR HORRIFIC ANIMAL CRUELTY INVOLVING GERMAN SHEPHERD CROSS LENNY
Theresa Dixon, a resident of Hillside Farm on Boundary Road in Prenton, Wirral, was found guilty of severe animal neglect and cruelty in connection with the tragic case of her eight-year-old German Shepherd cross, named Lenny. The incident drew significant attention from animal welfare authorities and the local community, highlighting the devastating consequences of neglecting a defenseless pet.According to veterinary reports and court proceedings, Lenny suffered from a grievous wound on the side of his face, measuring approximately 10 centimeters in length. The injury extended from his ear down to the corner of his mouth, and alarmingly, it was discovered that the wound had become infested with maggots. Despite the severity of the injury, Theresa Dixon delayed seeking professional veterinary treatment, claiming that the wound had only recently appeared, within the last half-hour before she finally took him to the vet.
During her initial visit to the veterinarian, Dixon insisted that she had attempted to treat the infection herself, relying on advice she found on the internet. She stated that she had used a solution of white vinegar and water to clean the wound, believing this would help. However, veterinary experts concluded that the wound was much older, with evidence suggesting that Lenny had been suffering for several weeks. The presence of maggots and the extent of tissue damage indicated prolonged neglect, which had caused the dog immense pain and suffering.
Tragically, Lenny's condition was so dire that the veterinarian made the decision to euthanize him to prevent further suffering. The examination revealed that the wound was not only deep and infected but also that Lenny's ears contained traces of E. coli and faecal matter, and his coat was heavily matted and dirty. The veterinarian also noted that the dog’s long, unkempt coat would have been especially uncomfortable during the warm weather at that time.
Veterinary evidence suggested that the wound was likely self-inflicted, with experts believing that Lenny was scratching his ear due to an underlying infection, which contributed to the worsening of his injuries. The neglect was described as a catalogue of failures, with the dog left in excruciating pain, suffering from untreated infections and poor hygiene.
Following the euthanasia, an RSPCA inspector visited Dixon’s home. The inspector reported that while the house was kept in an immaculate condition, Lenny was confined to an outside kennel, isolated from the comfort of the home. The inspector emphasized that the neglect was particularly egregious given the dog's suffering and the apparent lack of proper care.
During the court proceedings, Dixon faced charges of causing unnecessary suffering to an animal. She had previously been convicted in her absence of this offence but appeared in person for sentencing. Chris Murphy, representing the RSPCA, described the case as one of extreme cruelty, highlighting the severity of the injuries and the pain inflicted upon Lenny. Murphy pointed out that the wound was so deep that it extended beneath the skin by several centimeters, and the presence of maggots indicated that the injury had been neglected for a significant period.
Defense attorney Gary Lawrenson acknowledged Dixon’s difficult personal circumstances, including the death of her husband due to alcohol-related issues and her own injuries sustained during a home invasion. However, the magistrates, led by Chairman Peter Sanders, made it clear that animal cruelty would not be tolerated, emphasizing that animals have no voice and that the court’s role is to speak for them.
In sentencing, Theresa Dixon received a 20-week custodial sentence, which was suspended for two years. She was also ordered to complete a two-year community order, including a 20-day rehabilitation activity requirement and 60 hours of unpaid work. Additionally, she was mandated to pay costs of £500 and a victim surcharge of £115. Most notably, she was given a lifetime ban on keeping animals, a measure intended to prevent any future neglect or cruelty.
RSPCA inspector Anthony Joynes commented on the case, emphasizing the extent of the neglect. He explained that the wound was so severe that it extended under the skin by 3cm, 5cm, and up to 10cm at its deepest point, effectively leaving half of Lenny’s face missing. The presence of maggots and the condition of the wound suggested that the injury had been present for much longer than Dixon claimed. Joynes described Lenny’s suffering as unimaginable, citing the dog’s long, matted coat, the infection in his ears, and the overall neglect that led to his tragic death. He reiterated that such cases of cruelty are taken very seriously by authorities, and justice was served in this instance to uphold the welfare of animals everywhere.