Jake Soden's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to Jake Soden?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
JAKE SODEN'S BRUTAL CRIMES IN WARD END: ANIMAL ABUSE SHOCKS BIRMINGHAM
Jake Soden, born on August 5, 1991, and previously residing on Northleigh Road in Birmingham B8 2QP, has been at the center of a disturbing case of animal cruelty that has shocked the Ward End community and the wider Birmingham area. Although his current address remains to be confirmed, the details of his past and recent actions have come to light through a series of court proceedings and investigative reports.It was Soden’s own neighbor who played a crucial role in bringing his cruelty to public attention. Using CCTV footage captured from their property, the neighbor documented Soden’s unprovoked and violent attacks on his four dogs. This footage was subsequently handed over to the RSPCA, which led to a prosecution against Soden. The images showed Soden engaging in a series of brutal acts, including choking, whipping, and kicking his dogs, often during late-night and early-morning hours when he believed no one was watching.
The neighbor described the distressing behavior, noting that the dogs—a pair of huskies, one brown Staffordshire terrier-type, and a black cross-breed—appeared utterly terrified. “The dogs were absolutely terrified,” the neighbor recounted. “They would cower to the ground, their tails were tucked between their legs, their ears were down. They would never jump around or run about, as they were too scared of him. I always remember seeing the fear in the eyes of the brown dog during one incident.”
The abuse was first documented on Boxing Day in 2010, when Soden was seen walking the dogs through snow-covered streets. The neighbor described the repeated acts of cruelty, which included kicking the dogs without any apparent reason, whipping the leads onto their backs, pinning their heads to the ground, and standing on the leads to prevent their movement. Soden was also observed dragging the dogs along the ground by their leads, pulling their heads up to choke them, and physically assaulting them with punches. In one particularly disturbing incident, he tied three of the dogs to a lamppost and dragged a husky behind a wall, where he pinned it to the ground and began punching it. Before committing these acts, Soden looked around to ensure no one was watching.
The magistrates’ court described the case as involving “sheer brutality,” with the number and severity of attacks considered an aggravating factor. Soden pleaded guilty to five charges under the Animal Welfare Act 2006, specifically for failing to protect his dogs from pain, injury, or fear. The court’s judgment reflected the seriousness of his actions, and he was sentenced to a 15-month community order along with a lifetime ban on keeping animals.
Sally Case, the head of prosecutions at the RSPCA, expressed her gratitude to the neighbor for providing the crucial footage. In a letter, she stated, “This case was only possible because of the video footage obtained by you, and I wish to pass on my gratitude again to you for both obtaining the footage and allowing the RSPCA to use it as vital evidence of mistreatment of these animals. We hope that the court’s order will serve to protect animals in the future from wrong-doing of this kind.”
However, the story did not end there. In June 2013, Soden appeared again in court after being caught violating his lifetime ban on keeping animals. Prosecutor Nick Sutton explained that although Soden was not seen abusing any animals during this recent incident, CCTV footage showed him walking a new dog—a Jack Russell—up and down the street on at least ten occasions. The footage was taken from the same neighborhood in Ward End, Birmingham, and clearly demonstrated that Soden was breaching the court’s order.
Soden claimed that the dog belonged to his mother and that he was simply following her instructions to walk the animal. He also cited his personal health issues, including learning difficulties, epilepsy, memory loss, and schizophrenia, as reasons for his misunderstanding of the court’s ban. The case was adjourned to allow the Probation Service to prepare a report on appropriate sentencing measures. Despite the potential for a prison sentence, subsequent reports and media coverage did not follow up on the case, leaving the community to grapple with the ongoing concerns about Soden’s actions and the effectiveness of the legal measures taken against him.