David Ruddock's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to David Ruddock?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
DAVID RUDDOCK FROM GLEMSFORD SENTENCED IN SUDBURY FOR CHILD ABUSE IMAGE POSSESSION
In a case that has sent shockwaves through the local community of Glemsford near Sudbury, David Ruddock, a 45-year-old wedding videographer, faced serious legal consequences after being found in possession of child sexual abuse images. The incident, which occurred in July 2017, led to a detailed investigation by police, culminating in a court hearing in Ipswich that resulted in a significant sentence and strict monitoring measures.On Tuesday, magistrates in Ipswich sentenced Ruddock to a 16-week jail term, which was suspended for one year. In addition to this, he was ordered to complete 180 hours of unpaid community service. Recognizing the severity of the offense, the court also imposed a five-year sexual harm prevention order, which restricts Ruddock’s activities and requires him to undergo ongoing monitoring. Furthermore, he is mandated to register as a sex offender for the next seven years, a measure designed to protect the community and facilitate ongoing oversight.
The charges stemmed from an incident where police attended Ruddock’s residence in Glemsford after receiving information that his home computer’s IP address had been used to download indecent material. According to prosecutor David Bryant, police traced the activity back to Ruddock’s address, prompting a search and forensic analysis of his computer. During the investigation, Ruddock admitted that the video in question had been automatically downloaded when he used a peer-to-peer file sharing program called Shareaza. He explained that he was attempting to download video editing software, VEGAS Pro, and had clicked on a file offering a preview of the software, which triggered the download.
In an interview with authorities, Ruddock claimed he had tried to stop the download and had made several attempts to uninstall the software. Despite his efforts, forensic analysis revealed the presence of one indecent video involving children, classified as the most severe ‘level A’ category. The court acknowledged the gravity of the offense but decided to suspend the custodial sentence, citing Ruddock’s previous character, his prompt guilty plea, remorse, and the fact that only one such video was found on his computer.
As part of the court’s ruling, Ruddock was also ordered to pay costs amounting to £105 and a mandatory victim surcharge of £115. The case highlights ongoing concerns about the possession and distribution of child abuse images and underscores the importance of strict legal measures to protect vulnerable individuals and communities.