Stuart Mason's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to Stuart Mason?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
STUART MASON OF AIRDRIE AND GLENMAVIS FACES CHARGES IN SCANDAL INVOLVING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY
In a case that has sent shockwaves through the local communities of Airdrie and Glenmavis, Stuart Mason, a 24-year-old man, appeared in court to face serious allegations related to the distribution and possession of child pornography. The charges stem from a nationwide investigation into a child exploitation ring, with Mason identified as a key participant involved in the sharing of illicit images and videos depicting the sexual abuse of young children.According to court records, Mason operated from his residence in Glenmavis over a span of approximately three years. During this period, he downloaded a significant number of indecent images—specifically, 434 photographs and 60 videos—featuring young boys and girls. Authorities revealed that two of these images were classified under the most severe category on the Oliver Scale, a grading system used across Scottish courts to assess the severity of computer-generated child pornography.
The investigation was initiated when vice-squad officers executed a search warrant at Mason’s home on November 15, 2006. During the raid, law enforcement officials seized various computer devices from his bedroom, including desktop computers and storage media. It was not until July 2008 that Strathclyde Police forensic analysts completed their examination of the seized equipment, which included computers and mobile phones. The analysis uncovered a disturbing array of digital evidence, including chat files and communications with other users involved in the sharing of child abuse material.
Prosecutor Lindsay Dalziel detailed the findings to the court, stating that during interviews, Mason was notably candid with police. She explained that investigators discovered approximately 50 chat conversations with other users, in which indecent images of children were exchanged. Further investigations led to a second police raid in September 2008, during which additional devices—such as laptops, an iPod, and a pen drive—were confiscated. These devices contained more images and videos depicting the sexual abuse of children.
Ms. Dalziel emphasized that Mason admitted to downloading the illicit material and to distributing it to others. He was detained and held in custody before appearing before the court on a petition for bail. Mason, who resides on Appin Way, pleaded guilty to charges of possessing and creating indecent photographs of children, covering the period from November 11, 2005, to September 11, 2008. He also admitted to distributing and showing these images to others between June 26, 2006, and November 16, 2006.
However, Mason denied allegations of engaging in lewd and libidinous conduct at his home between November 1, 2004, and December 15, 2005. It was alleged that he had sent emails to a 13-year-old boy, viewed the boy via webcam, made indecent remarks, and encouraged the boy to remove his clothing and expose himself on camera. The Crown accepted Mason’s plea of not guilty to these specific charges.
Given the gravity of the case, Sheriff Petra Collins decided to defer sentencing until the following month. This delay allows for the preparation of comprehensive background reports, including an assessment of the risk Mason poses to children. Mason has been placed on the Sex Offenders’ Register and will remain on it for a minimum of five years, with the exact duration to be determined at sentencing. Additionally, a psychological evaluation has been ordered from Dr. Cindy Shields, a clinical psychologist based at Hartwood Hospital in Lanarkshire.
Prior to sentencing, the sheriff will review a sample of the images and videos that Mason created, in chambers. Mason was released on bail under strict conditions, including a ban on any contact with individuals under 18 and a prohibition from using the internet. He left the court without commenting on the proceedings, leaving the community to await the final outcome of this disturbing case.