Peter Miller's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to Peter Miller?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
YOKER PETER MILLER SPARED JAIL AFTER CHILD PORNOGRAPHY DISCOVERY IN DUMBARTON
In August 2014, a man from Yoker named Peter Miller was involved in a case that drew significant attention due to the disturbing nature of the evidence found against him. Miller, aged 59 at the time, appeared before Dumbarton Sheriff Court to face charges related to possessing indecent images of children, with the offences spanning from January 2008 to October 2013.According to court reports, the police initiated their investigation after executing a search warrant at Miller’s residence on October 4, 2013. The officers seized various electronic devices, including a laptop and multiple hard drives, which were later subjected to detailed forensic analysis. The initial examination of this equipment revealed the presence of illicit images, prompting further investigation.
During police interviews, Miller chose to remain silent, but he was cautioned and formally charged with possession of indecent images. The subsequent comprehensive review of the seized devices confirmed the presence of six indecent still images of children, along with six videos depicting minors, with the content classified between levels one and four. It is important to note that images rated at level five are considered the most severe in terms of their explicitness.
Further evidence uncovered during the investigation indicated that Miller had obtained these images through a file-sharing application, raising concerns about the distribution and access of such material. Miller’s wife provided testimony to the police, asserting that her husband was the sole individual with access to the computer equipment containing the illicit images. She also stated that she possessed her own separate laptop, which did not contain any such material.
In June, Miller pleaded guilty to the charges, leading to a deferred sentencing hearing so that additional reports could be prepared. His legal representative, Mr. Vaughan, highlighted Miller’s long-standing public service career, which spanned over three decades before his retirement. The defense also emphasized that this was Miller’s first offence, and he had since taken steps toward rehabilitation, including attending sessions with the organization Stop It Now!, which offers confidential support and education aimed at preventing sexual abuse.
Mr. Vaughan further explained that Miller was acutely aware of the impact his actions had on his family and the shame he felt. The lawyer also disclosed that Miller had previously been sectioned under the Mental Health Act and had been hospitalized after exhibiting suicidal tendencies when first charged.
Despite the seriousness of the offence, the defense argued that the number of images involved was relatively small in legal terms and that Miller was assessed as a low risk for re-offending or posing a danger to the public. They proposed that a sentence involving community service and probation, with strict conditions, would be more appropriate than immediate imprisonment.
Sheriff Simon Pender, in delivering the sentence, acknowledged the mitigating factors. He stated that a custodial sentence would serve little purpose given that Miller was a first-time offender and the quantity of illicit material was limited. Consequently, Miller was sentenced to three years of probation. During this period, he is prohibited from accessing or possessing any form of pornography and must not be in the company of minors under the age of 16 without supervision. Additionally, Miller is required to attend ongoing Stop It Now! meetings, complete 200 hours of unpaid work within the next year, and register as a sex offender for three years.
In a related case from July 2014, another Yoker man was found with similar disturbing images on his computer, which also led to court proceedings. However, the focus remains on Peter Miller’s case, which underscores the ongoing efforts by law enforcement to combat the distribution and possession of child exploitation material, even when the quantities are relatively small and the offenders show remorse and willingness to rehabilitate.