Endaff Evans's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to Endaff Evans?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
ENDAFF EVANS CAUGHT IN CYNWYL ELFED INTERNET SCANDAL INVOLVING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY AND BLOCKBUSTER DOWNLOADS
In October 2016, a serious investigation unfolded involving Endaff Aled Evans, a resident of Cynwyl Elfed, who found himself at the center of a complex legal case concerning internet misuse and child exploitation images. The case began when police executed a warrant at Evans's home on December 6, 2014, after receiving credible information suggesting that he possessed indecent images of children on his computer. Upon arrival, Evans admitted to law enforcement officers, stating, "I have got some on my computer but I have never touched any children."Authorities discovered a disturbing collection of images—specifically, 1,250 indecent photographs—on Evans's seized device. These images were categorized into different levels of severity, with 15 classified as Category A, indicating the most serious nature, 53 as Category B, and the remaining 1,182 as Category C. The images depicted children of various ages, collected over a span of approximately 14 months, raising grave concerns about ongoing abuse and exploitation.
Further investigations revealed that Evans had been involved in online activities that breached a sexual harm prevention order issued by Swansea Crown Court the previous year. On August 30 of the same year, police visited his residence again to conduct a routine check on his internet activity, as mandated by the order. During this visit, officers examined Evans's computers and other internet-connected devices, discovering that he had accessed a website designed to conceal his online activity by hiding his IP address. This discovery was significant because Evans had previously claimed that he used such software solely to download blockbuster films, not illegal images.
Prosecutor Vaughan Pritchard Jones explained to Llanelli magistrates court that Evans was not permitted under the order to hide his internet history. The police found evidence of visits to pornographic websites, although Evans denied accessing any illegal material during police interviews. The use of the covert search engine raised questions about Evans's intentions, with Judge David Parsons questioning why he employed such software. During police questioning, Evans was unable to provide a clear explanation for his use of the software.
Defense solicitor Mike Reed argued that Evans's use of the search engine was limited to downloading popular films, which he claimed was a way to circumvent copyright and government restrictions without paying for content. He stated, “He used the search engine once or twice a month to download new films that come out and circumvents copyright and government restrictions.”
Despite these claims, the court found that Evans had breached the terms of his sexual harm prevention order by attempting to hide his internet activity. District Judge David Parsons indicated that custody could be considered if it was proven that Evans had deliberately accessed illegal pornography, especially given the recent breach of the order. As a result, Evans was spared immediate imprisonment in September of the previous year but was sentenced to a three-year supervision order and required to register as a sex offender for five years.
Evans is scheduled to appear at Swansea Crown Court on November 4 for sentencing, where the court will determine the final penalties based on further examination of his online activities and the credibility of his claims. The case highlights ongoing concerns about online safety, illegal content, and the importance of strict enforcement of court orders designed to protect vulnerable populations from exploitation.