DUNCAN BREEZE FROM OXTED INVOLVED IN HOUSE OF COMMONS SCANDAL WITH PAEDOPHILE CONVICTION

In a startling revelation that has sent shockwaves through the political and criminal communities, Duncan Breeze, a resident of Oxted, has been linked to a controversial relationship with a convicted paedophile who previously served time for possessing thousands of disturbing images of children. The incident took place within the hallowed halls of the House of Commons, raising serious questions about security protocols and the vetting process for visitors and guests.

According to sources, Breeze, 39, who has a background as a musician and has appeared in pantomimes as Prince Charming, was seen dining and socializing with the convicted individual, who was released from prison after serving a two-year sentence. The conviction stemmed from the discovery of 4,270 indecent images on his computers, which he claimed were downloaded by an employee, asserting his innocence throughout the legal proceedings. Breeze was convicted in 2007 at Luton Crown Court of 20 separate offences related to the possession of these images and was subsequently placed on the Sex Offenders’ Register for a decade.

The judge at the time described the images as particularly disgusting and emphasized the distress caused to the children depicted. The court also noted that the existence of such material fuels a harmful market, and Breeze’s actions contributed to this illicit trade. Despite his criminal record, Breeze has since transitioned into a consultancy role, working with a company that offers income protection support for the unemployed. Notably, Sir Edward Leigh, a veteran Conservative MP, serves as the non-executive chairman of this company.

Recent investigations have uncovered that Breeze was invited to the House of Commons on multiple occasions for lunch by Sir Edward Leigh. When confronted about these meetings at his home near Gainsborough, Lincolnshire, Sir Edward defended his association with Breeze, stating that Breeze had disclosed his past conviction and that he believed in redemption. Sir Edward emphasized that Breeze had served his time and that his previous life should not influence current relationships or professional dealings. He further stated, “He has served his time. I believe in redemption and forgiveness. His former life is nothing to do with me.”

Sir Edward Leigh, who was knighted in 2013 for his public service, has been a Member of Parliament since 1983. He has publicly expressed strong opinions on criminal justice, criticizing short jail sentences and advocating for harsher penalties for offenders. In recent years, he has also spoken out on issues related to child protection and the emotional trauma inflicted by sexual violence in conflict zones.

At his residence in Oxted, Breeze addressed the allegations, asserting that he had only met Sir Edward a few times at the House of Commons and that he was engaged as a consultant for various firms, including the one chaired by Leigh. He claimed that his conviction was disclosed to Sir Edward before any consultancy work commenced and accused his legal team of mishandling his case, asserting that new evidence might eventually overturn his conviction through an appeal lodged with the European Court. Breeze expressed frustration over what he described as a miscarriage of justice, claiming that his defense was compromised by errors made during his trial.

His legal troubles began in October 2004 when Croatian law enforcement agencies alerted UK authorities, leading to the discovery of child pornography at his former home near Sandy, Bedfordshire, and at his parents’ residence in Weston-Super-Mare, North Somerset. Breeze maintained his innocence, insisting that he believed the images had been downloaded by an employee and that he was unfairly convicted. He argued that the legal process was flawed and that new evidence could potentially exonerate him, though the process was expected to take years.

In summary, the case of Duncan Breeze highlights complex issues surrounding criminal justice, rehabilitation, and the potential lapses in security within political institutions. The connection between Breeze and Sir Edward Leigh continues to be scrutinized, raising questions about the oversight and vetting procedures for individuals granted access to Parliament’s inner sanctum. As investigations proceed, the public remains concerned about the implications of such associations and the measures needed to prevent similar incidents in the future.