CRAIG DRUMMOND'S CRIMES IN CRUDEN BAY: CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE BEHAVIOR REVEALED

In a case that has sent shockwaves through the community of Cruden Bay, Craig Drummond, aged 35, has been found guilty of a series of controlling and abusive actions directed towards multiple women over a span of several years. The proceedings took place in a sheriff court where the court condemned Drummond for his blatant disregard for responsibility and the harm caused by his actions.

Evidence presented during the trial painted a disturbing picture of a man who repeatedly engaged in manipulative and invasive behaviors. It was revealed that Drummond would often demand to know the whereabouts of his partners and with whom they were associating, displaying a pattern of obsessive control. His conduct extended beyond mere questioning; he created an OnlyFans account using one of his ex-partner’s email addresses without her consent, an act that demonstrated a blatant violation of her privacy. Additionally, he questioned another partner about unplugging CCTV cameras he had installed during their time living together, further illustrating his intrusive tendencies.

The court also heard about the impact of Drummond’s personal struggles, particularly related to his business, Drummond Events. The company faced a highly publicized downfall after investigations revealed that pre-paid arrangements had been left unfulfilled, leading to numerous customer complaints. This professional turmoil appeared to contribute to his increasingly erratic and controlling behavior.

Details of his past relationships were laid bare, revealing a troubling pattern of abuse. His first victim was involved with him from October 2020 to December 2021. During this period, Drummond exhibited controlling behaviors such as insisting on monitoring her location, questioning her movements, and even creating a false online account to spy on her. His subsequent relationships were marked by similar conduct, including threats, excessive messaging, and intimidation tactics. Evidence also indicated that he had been present at his second partner’s home during unsanctioned hours, with footprints found at her address and CCTV footage suggesting he had been spying on her.

The third victim recounted being shouted at, sworn at, and subjected to ongoing mental abuse, highlighting the emotional toll of his actions. Throughout the court proceedings, Drummond pleaded guilty to three charges of engaging in a course of conduct that was abusive towards his partners. The court acknowledged the lasting harm caused by his behavior and imposed a series of penalties, including a 15-month supervision order, the requirement to complete 144 hours of unpaid work, and five-year non-harassment orders to prevent further contact.

The sheriff expressed deep disappointment in Drummond’s apparent lack of remorse, emphasizing that his persistent controlling conduct over many years constitutes a serious offense. The court also took into account his background, which includes personal and financial difficulties stemming from personal loss and the failure of his business. The judge underscored the importance of recognizing the psychological damage inflicted by such controlling behavior and sentenced Drummond accordingly, reflecting the court’s stance on the severity of his actions and the need to protect victims from further harm.