Anthony Edwards's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to Anthony Edwards?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
ANTHONY EDWARDS FROM DUCKLINGTON FACES JAIL AFTER SECOND OFFENSE INVOLVING CHILD INDECENT IMAGES
In a case that has once again brought to light the serious issue of child exploitation and the failure of preventative measures, Anthony Edwards, a resident of Aston Road in Ducklington, has been convicted and sentenced for possessing indecent images of children for the second time. The incident underscores the ongoing challenges faced by law enforcement and judicial authorities in curbing the activities of individuals who repeatedly breach court orders designed to prevent such offenses.Edwards, aged 58, was initially subject to a sexual offences prevention order issued on October 16, 2014, following previous allegations related to child exploitation. Despite this legal restriction, he was found to have violated the order between January 5, 2016, and September 1, 2016, by removing security software installed on his personal laptop and deleting internet browsing history, actions that suggest an attempt to conceal his activities.
The case came before Oxford Crown Court, where Edwards was scheduled to face trial on multiple charges, including two counts of breaching the sexual offences prevention order, three counts of making indecent photographs of children, and one count of possessing a prohibited image of a child. However, in a surprising turn of events, Edwards chose to admit all charges on January 15, 2018, rather than proceed to trial. The court subsequently sentenced him on the following day.
During the proceedings, the court was informed of the extent of Edwards’ offending. He admitted to creating nine images classified as Category A, which denotes the most severe and explicit material, along with 26 Category B images and a significant 214 Category C images, all depicting children engaged in sexual activities. Additionally, he possessed three other images that were classified as prohibited under the law.
Judge Andrew Goymer, presiding over the case, emphasized the gravity of Edwards’ actions and the breach of court orders. He stated, “All sentencing options remain open and a sentence of immediate imprisonment cannot be ruled out. It is the second time he has found himself committing offences involving indecent images of children and he has clearly breached his order on a number of regards so he should not leave court with the idea he is not at risk of a prison sentence.”
As a result of his convictions, Edwards was sentenced to 15 months in prison for each of the offences, with all sentences to run concurrently. Furthermore, he is required to register as a sex offender for a period of ten years and is subject to an indefinite sexual harm prevention order, reflecting the ongoing risk he poses to the community.
His sentencing is scheduled for February 15, 2018, after the completion of a pre-sentence report, which will further inform the court’s decision on his future. The case highlights the persistent threat posed by individuals who, despite legal restrictions, continue to engage in illegal activities related to child exploitation, and underscores the importance of vigilant enforcement and judicial oversight.