Andrew Wild's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to Andrew Wild?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
ANDREW WILD FROM PATELEY BRIDGE ESCAPES JAIL AFTER DOWNLOAD OF CHILD ABUSE IMAGES IN YORK
In a case that has shocked the community of Pateley Bridge, Andrew Wild, a 69-year-old resident known for his charitable contributions, narrowly avoided imprisonment after admitting to the possession and download of a significant number of indecent images depicting children. The incident came to light during a court hearing at York Crown Court, where Wild appeared on a Friday dressed in a pristine dark suit, complemented by a white shirt and a tie, presenting himself in a composed and orderly manner.Prosecutor Philip Adams outlined the details of Wild’s online activities, revealing that the pensioner had utilized a ‘drop-box’ application to access and download the illicit material. The investigation uncovered that Wild had amassed over 1,000 indecent images, a disturbing collection that included 360 images classified as Category A, representing the most severe form of child sexual abuse. These images depicted the most serious types of exploitation, involving children subjected to extreme sexual abuse.
In addition to the Category A images, the court was informed that Wild had downloaded 273 images categorized as B, and 420 images classified as C, along with three computer-generated images that simulated child sexual abuse. Some of these images featured children as young as two years old, highlighting the disturbing nature of his online activity. Wild had previously admitted to three counts of downloading indecent images and one count of possessing the three prohibited images during a hearing prior to the sentencing.
The court heard that Wild’s illicit activities took place over a period from July to November of the previous year, with evidence indicating that he accessed the material through a specific online link. Judge Andrew Stubbs QC addressed Wild directly during the sentencing, emphasizing the gravity of his actions. The judge stated, “You were accessing, on the internet, images of serious abuse of children. Every image that you view shows a child’s life and childhood being taken away from them. Some of them were as young as two.”
Despite the severity of the charges, Wild was sentenced to 12 months in prison. However, the sentence was suspended for two years, taking into account his efforts at rehabilitation, positive references from numerous individuals, and his guilty plea. The court also ordered Wild to be registered on the sex offenders’ register for a decade and imposed a sexual-harm prevention order of a similar duration to restrict his online activities further. This case underscores the ongoing concerns about online child exploitation and the importance of judicial measures to prevent reoffending, even when offenders show remorse and take steps toward rehabilitation.