⚠️ Warning: Information is collected from public sources and is accurate to the best of our knowledge. Please do not take the law into your own hands. This website is intended to help keep your loved ones safe by raising awareness about dangerous abusers. For inquiries, contact us on our Facebook Page: Expose Them All - Red Rose UK .

ANDREW MADDOCK SHOCKS ST HELENS WITH CHILD PORN CASE IN ASHTON-IN-MAKERFIELD

By  | 

In a highly unusual and controversial court ruling, Andrew Maddock, a teacher from Garswood Primary School in St Helens, found himself at the center of a criminal case involving the viewing of indecen.... Scroll down for more information.


Andrew Maddock's Social Media Accounts

  • No phone numbers or social media accounts linked yet. Be the first to report one below.
  • Know a Social Media Account Linked to Andrew Maddock?

    Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.

    ANDREW MADDOCK SHOCKS ST HELENS WITH CHILD PORN CASE IN ASHTON-IN-MAKERFIELD

    In a highly unusual and controversial court ruling, Andrew Maddock, a teacher from Garswood Primary School in St Helens, found himself at the center of a criminal case involving the viewing of indecent images of children. The incident, which came to light in July 2001, has sparked widespread debate about the appropriate response to such offenses and the potential for rehabilitation.

    Andrew Maddock, aged 41, was suspended from his teaching duties at Garswood Primary School following allegations that he had accessed and viewed pornographic images of minors on a school computer. The case was heard at St Helens Magistrates’ Court, where District Judge Bruce Morgan delivered a verdict that surprised many. Maddock was charged with five counts of obtaining indecent photographs of children via the internet, with the incidents reportedly occurring in June of the previous year.

    During the proceedings, Maddock pleaded guilty to the charges. In a move that drew considerable attention, Judge Morgan granted him an absolute discharge, effectively allowing him to walk free without a criminal conviction. The judge explicitly urged the local education authority to consider reinstating Maddock, describing his actions as “a moment of supreme madness” and emphasizing that he posed no ongoing risk to children. The judge stated, “If it is a matter of discretion for the LEA, I would ask them to forgive him. He poses no risk to any child whatsoever and although what he has done is wrong, I sincerely hope he can return to teaching when he is free to do so.”

    Despite the court’s leniency, Maddock remains suspended from his position on full pay, and the school’s authorities have announced an investigation into his conduct. The outcome of this inquiry will determine whether he will be allowed to resume his teaching career. The case also revealed that Maddock’s wife, Sarah, who is a humanities teacher at Garswood Primary and is also suspended, was given a laptop in July 1999 to use at their home on Garswood Road in Ashton-in-Makerfield, near Wigan. The computer was later returned to the school, and authorities discovered images of a sexual nature, some involving children, stored on its hard drive.

    Police were promptly notified, and upon seizing the computer, a significant amount of pornographic material was uncovered. Prosecutor Dan Travis explained that Maddock had been searching for such images but was unaware that the hard drive retained an imprint of the material. He clarified, “He didn’t attempt to download or save the pictures. He admitted viewing the images but it wasn’t for any sexual gratification, rather a morbid curiosity. His home was searched and no property of any note was taken.”

    Throughout the three-hour hearing, Maddock was visibly distressed, fighting back tears and being comforted by his wife. His defense attorney, Teresa Loftus, presented a collection of cards and a signed book from well-wishers, including family, friends, and former pupils, emphasizing Maddock’s positive influence and remorse. She stated, “He is truly sorry that he ever looked at those photographs and never believed they would ever see the light of day again. He was looking at adult porn and occasionally images of children came up, and he didn’t know that he was committing an offence. He is a broken man.”

    Mrs. Loftus further explained that the couple, devastated by the case, had been pursuing fertility treatments and had considered adoption, but the stress of the situation forced them to abandon these plans. She added, “They were actively pursuing adoption, but as a result of this conviction, they will never be allowed to adopt and the reality is that they will never have a family. Mr. Maddock is an industrious and hard-working man with 16 years of teaching experience. Many children he taught are grateful to him, and some continue to write to him despite the charges. It is tragic that he has to appear before any court, let alone under these circumstances. This is disastrous for him, his family, and all who love him. His wife has also been suspended because the computer was in her name, and they are resigned to the fact that they may never teach again. Maddock is described as an emotionally damaged and scarred man, with the impact of this case already far exceeding any potential sentence.”

    In delivering his verdict, Judge Morgan emphasized the minimal nature of the offense and Maddock’s character, stating, “What purpose would punishing him have? No one will come before the court with a finer character, and this offense was at the bottom of the scale. He made a mistake and knows it may ruin his life for years to come.” The judge also highlighted the heartfelt support Maddock received, quoting a former pupil who said, “Mr Maddock was an inspiration and I will never forget all he has done for me.”

    Judge Morgan further commented that Sarah Maddock, his wife, should be allowed to return to her teaching role since no criminal proceedings had been initiated against her. A spokesperson for St Helens Council stated that they would now conduct their own disciplinary procedures into Maddock’s conduct and would investigate Sarah’s role as well. Maddock was ordered to pay costs of £500 and has 14 days to register as a sex offender, as required by law.

    Other Abusers in St Helens

    36 CHILD SEXUAL ABUSERS IN ST HELENS, SAINT HELENS, UK

    Red Rose UK currently has 36 Child Sexual Abusers mapped in the St Helens, Saint Helens, UK area

    About Red Rose

    Red Rose is the UK's biggest free-to-use public database of sexual abusers, animal abusers and domestic abusers. Our mission is to promote community safety and awareness.