WILL SCOTT FROM BROMLEY CAUGHT IN SCANDAL INVOLVING SCHOOLBOY IN BARRETT, LONDON
| Red Rose Database
Barrett – Bromley Sexual Abuser
In July 2022, a former officer of the Metropolitan Police, identified as Will Scott, found himself at the center of a disturbing case involving inappropriate communications with a minor. The incident took place in the context of his residence in Bromley, a district in South East London, and has garnered significant attention due to the serious nature of the allegations.
Will Scott, aged 33, was convicted of sending sexual messages to a schoolboy under the age of 16. The court proceedings revealed that Scott had engaged in this misconduct while off-duty, with no connection to his professional duties as a police officer. Despite the gravity of his actions, he was spared immediate imprisonment, receiving a nine-month jail sentence that was suspended for a period of 12 months. This means that he will not serve time in prison unless he commits another offense within that period.
The case was heard at Isleworth Crown Court, where it was established that Scott had pleaded guilty to a charge of sexual communication with a child on or before February 3 of the previous year. The court was informed that the inappropriate contact began in April 2020, when Scott was in communication with the 15-year-old victim through social media platforms Snapchat and Discord. The messages exchanged included graphic sexual images and videos, which were sent by Scott to the minor. The identity of the victim has been protected for legal reasons, and he cannot be named publicly.
It was emphasized during the hearing that Scott’s misconduct was entirely separate from his duties as a police officer. He has since resigned from the Metropolitan Police, a decision that was acknowledged by a spokeswoman for the force. The police misconduct hearing concluded that if Scott had not resigned voluntarily, he would have faced dismissal from his position.
During the sentencing, Judge Robin Johnson described the case as “undoubtedly a sad case,” expressing regret not only for Scott’s loss of his career and reputation but also for the emotional impact on the victim’s family. The judge highlighted the troubling nature of the case and the importance of addressing such misconduct seriously.
Throughout the proceedings, Scott remained silent, dressed in a navy suit, light blue shirt, and pink patterned tie. As part of his sentence, he is required to undergo 40 days of rehabilitation aimed at addressing his behavior. Additionally, he is subject to a sexual harm prevention order, which imposes restrictions intended to prevent further offenses.
Furthermore, Scott has been ordered to pay a victim surcharge and a statutory surcharge, financial penalties that are standard in such cases. Depending on the decision of the Disclosure and Barring Service, he may also face additional restrictions or bans from working with children or vulnerable individuals. The case underscores the ongoing concerns about safeguarding and the importance of monitoring individuals in positions of trust, especially when allegations of misconduct involve minors.
Will Scott, aged 33, was convicted of sending sexual messages to a schoolboy under the age of 16. The court proceedings revealed that Scott had engaged in this misconduct while off-duty, with no connection to his professional duties as a police officer. Despite the gravity of his actions, he was spared immediate imprisonment, receiving a nine-month jail sentence that was suspended for a period of 12 months. This means that he will not serve time in prison unless he commits another offense within that period.
The case was heard at Isleworth Crown Court, where it was established that Scott had pleaded guilty to a charge of sexual communication with a child on or before February 3 of the previous year. The court was informed that the inappropriate contact began in April 2020, when Scott was in communication with the 15-year-old victim through social media platforms Snapchat and Discord. The messages exchanged included graphic sexual images and videos, which were sent by Scott to the minor. The identity of the victim has been protected for legal reasons, and he cannot be named publicly.
It was emphasized during the hearing that Scott’s misconduct was entirely separate from his duties as a police officer. He has since resigned from the Metropolitan Police, a decision that was acknowledged by a spokeswoman for the force. The police misconduct hearing concluded that if Scott had not resigned voluntarily, he would have faced dismissal from his position.
During the sentencing, Judge Robin Johnson described the case as “undoubtedly a sad case,” expressing regret not only for Scott’s loss of his career and reputation but also for the emotional impact on the victim’s family. The judge highlighted the troubling nature of the case and the importance of addressing such misconduct seriously.
Throughout the proceedings, Scott remained silent, dressed in a navy suit, light blue shirt, and pink patterned tie. As part of his sentence, he is required to undergo 40 days of rehabilitation aimed at addressing his behavior. Additionally, he is subject to a sexual harm prevention order, which imposes restrictions intended to prevent further offenses.
Furthermore, Scott has been ordered to pay a victim surcharge and a statutory surcharge, financial penalties that are standard in such cases. Depending on the decision of the Disclosure and Barring Service, he may also face additional restrictions or bans from working with children or vulnerable individuals. The case underscores the ongoing concerns about safeguarding and the importance of monitoring individuals in positions of trust, especially when allegations of misconduct involve minors.