PETER KUNDRACK FROM LAMPETER CAUGHT IN DISTURBING ONLINE PREDATION SCHEME INVOLVING MANCHESTER GIRL
| Red Rose Database
Lampeter Child Sexual Abuser
In a case that has shocked the local community and raised serious concerns about online safety, Peter Kundrak, a 27-year-old resident of Lampeter, was found to have engaged in a disturbing series of online conversations with what he believed was a 13-year-old girl from Manchester. The incident, which unfolded over several months, involved explicit exchanges and inappropriate requests, culminating in a court hearing at Swansea Crown Court.
According to court reports, the investigation was initiated after members of the paedophile hunter group known as Confronted and Caught created a fake social media profile under the name Amber, claiming to be a 13-year-old girl from Manchester. This profile was used to lure potential offenders, including Kundrak, who made initial contact with the profile in July of the previous year. The conversations quickly escalated as Kundrak and the fake profile exchanged messages on WhatsApp, with the defendant engaging in increasingly sexualized dialogue.
Prosecutor John Hipkin detailed that over the following months, Kundrak maintained frequent and regular contact with the individual he believed was Amber. The exchanges included explicit questions about her body, requests for her to perform sexual acts, and even asking her to send him her underwear. At one point, Kundrak sent the fake profile images of his own genitalia. The conversation also included talk of a potential meeting, with Kundrak suggesting he might travel from Lampeter to Manchester to meet Amber at Piccadilly Station. However, the prosecution accepted that these plans were likely superficial, and there was no concrete intention on Kundrak’s part to travel.
In October, Kundrak suddenly ceased all contact with the profile. It was after this break that the Confronted and Caught group reported his online behavior to the police. Authorities then identified Kundrak and brought him into custody. During the court proceedings, he pleaded guilty to attempting to incite a child to engage in sexual activity.
Judge Paul Thomas QC delivered a stern judgment, condemning Kundrak’s actions as “simply disgusting” and indicative of “paedophile tendencies.” The judge acknowledged that Kundrak had no real intention of meeting the girl but suggested that his sexual gratification was derived from the explicit conversations. Addressing the defendant directly, the judge described him as a “sick, inadequate fantasist.”
Rather than impose a short custodial sentence, Judge Thomas decided that it would be more beneficial for Kundrak—and society at large—that he undergo specialized support and treatment to address his issues. As part of his sentence, Kundrak was ordered to complete a two-year community order, participate in a rehabilitation program, and was placed under a five-year sexual harm prevention order. Additionally, he was registered on the sex offenders register, ensuring ongoing monitoring of his activities.
According to court reports, the investigation was initiated after members of the paedophile hunter group known as Confronted and Caught created a fake social media profile under the name Amber, claiming to be a 13-year-old girl from Manchester. This profile was used to lure potential offenders, including Kundrak, who made initial contact with the profile in July of the previous year. The conversations quickly escalated as Kundrak and the fake profile exchanged messages on WhatsApp, with the defendant engaging in increasingly sexualized dialogue.
Prosecutor John Hipkin detailed that over the following months, Kundrak maintained frequent and regular contact with the individual he believed was Amber. The exchanges included explicit questions about her body, requests for her to perform sexual acts, and even asking her to send him her underwear. At one point, Kundrak sent the fake profile images of his own genitalia. The conversation also included talk of a potential meeting, with Kundrak suggesting he might travel from Lampeter to Manchester to meet Amber at Piccadilly Station. However, the prosecution accepted that these plans were likely superficial, and there was no concrete intention on Kundrak’s part to travel.
In October, Kundrak suddenly ceased all contact with the profile. It was after this break that the Confronted and Caught group reported his online behavior to the police. Authorities then identified Kundrak and brought him into custody. During the court proceedings, he pleaded guilty to attempting to incite a child to engage in sexual activity.
Judge Paul Thomas QC delivered a stern judgment, condemning Kundrak’s actions as “simply disgusting” and indicative of “paedophile tendencies.” The judge acknowledged that Kundrak had no real intention of meeting the girl but suggested that his sexual gratification was derived from the explicit conversations. Addressing the defendant directly, the judge described him as a “sick, inadequate fantasist.”
Rather than impose a short custodial sentence, Judge Thomas decided that it would be more beneficial for Kundrak—and society at large—that he undergo specialized support and treatment to address his issues. As part of his sentence, Kundrak was ordered to complete a two-year community order, participate in a rehabilitation program, and was placed under a five-year sexual harm prevention order. Additionally, he was registered on the sex offenders register, ensuring ongoing monitoring of his activities.