PETER CHILDS FROM SMALL HEATH BREACHES COURT ORDER BY ALLOWING CHILDREN INTO HIS HOME
| Red Rose Database
Small Heath Sexual Abuser
Peter Childs, a man aged 54 and residing on Eversley Road in Small Heath, has found himself back in legal trouble after violating a court-imposed restriction. The Birmingham Crown Court heard that Childs, who is a convicted sex offender, had previously been subject to a sexual offences prevention order issued by Wolverhampton Crown Court in April 2009. This order was designed to restrict his interactions with minors and regulate his conduct to prevent further offenses.
Despite these restrictions, Childs admitted to breaching the order by allowing six children into his residence. The court proceedings revealed that the incident involved five boys and one girl, and it took place between May and November of the previous year. The breach was serious enough to warrant multiple charges, specifically ten counts of permitting children under the age of 16 to be in his home, which directly contravened the conditions set by the court.
During the hearing, Childs pleaded guilty to the charges, acknowledging his violation of the court order. The judge, after considering the case, decided to adjourn the sentencing to August 12. In the meantime, Childs was granted unconditional bail, allowing him to remain free pending the final decision on his punishment.
It is important to note that Childs’s actions, allowing minors into his home despite the restrictions, have led to these legal proceedings. The case underscores ongoing concerns about the management and supervision of convicted sex offenders, especially those with previous court orders in place. As of now, the court has not announced the specific sentence, only that the sentencing has been postponed to a later date. The outcome of this case will determine the legal consequences for Childs and serve as a reminder of the importance of adhering to court-imposed restrictions.
Despite these restrictions, Childs admitted to breaching the order by allowing six children into his residence. The court proceedings revealed that the incident involved five boys and one girl, and it took place between May and November of the previous year. The breach was serious enough to warrant multiple charges, specifically ten counts of permitting children under the age of 16 to be in his home, which directly contravened the conditions set by the court.
During the hearing, Childs pleaded guilty to the charges, acknowledging his violation of the court order. The judge, after considering the case, decided to adjourn the sentencing to August 12. In the meantime, Childs was granted unconditional bail, allowing him to remain free pending the final decision on his punishment.
It is important to note that Childs’s actions, allowing minors into his home despite the restrictions, have led to these legal proceedings. The case underscores ongoing concerns about the management and supervision of convicted sex offenders, especially those with previous court orders in place. As of now, the court has not announced the specific sentence, only that the sentencing has been postponed to a later date. The outcome of this case will determine the legal consequences for Childs and serve as a reminder of the importance of adhering to court-imposed restrictions.