PERRY REYNOLDS BANNED IN POOLE AFTER SEX CHARGE AND MASSAGE BUSINESS CONTROVERSY
| Red Rose Database
Poole Sexual Abuser
In February 2017, a significant case involving Perry Reynolds, a man with a controversial history in Poole, unfolded in the local courts. Reynolds, aged 55, who previously worked as a glamour photographer, faced serious allegations and legal restrictions related to his conduct and professional activities.
Reynolds publicly described himself at Bournemouth Crown Court as being “like Marmite, you either love it or hate it,” a statement reflecting his polarizing personality. During proceedings, he openly admitted that he would “sail close to the wind” when persuading models to disrobe and pose for photographs, a candid acknowledgment of his provocative approach. Despite this, he denied any intent or danger towards women, asserting that his actions were misunderstood or misrepresented.
His criminal record includes a conviction for sexual assault in 2012, where he was found guilty of touching the breasts and bottom of a 16-year-old girl who was working at his studio in Poole. Following this conviction, Reynolds was placed on the sex offenders register, a legal requirement meant to monitor and restrict his activities. Despite this, he later established a business offering sports massage services in the Ashley Cross area of Poole, raising concerns among authorities.
In response to his new venture, Dorset Police imposed a strict 10-year sexual harm prevention order in November, explicitly banning Reynolds from engaging in any work related to massage or similar services. The police cited concerns that Reynolds was “preoccupied with sex” and posed a potential risk to women, prompting the legal restrictions. Reynolds challenged this order in court, claiming that the police case was “a complete pack of lies.”
During the hearing, Reynolds admitted to telling officers he would “sail close to the wind” in his studio, describing instances where he touched a model’s arm and urged her to unbutton her blouse, allegedly encouraging her to “act sassy.” He defended his actions by stating that models enjoyed coming to his studio because of the “fun” and his “character,” implying that his behavior was part of a playful or flirtatious environment. Reynolds further explained that to get models to look “sexy,” he believed it was necessary to “sail close to the wind,” a statement that raised eyebrows among the court officials.
He also claimed to have a knack for quickly assessing models’ bra sizes, stating, “I have seen a lot of boobs,” which he used to justify his familiarity with female bodies. The court heard that Reynolds had touched another model’s breasts during a “deep massage technique” intended to help her with a supposed breathing problem, a claim he made to justify his actions. When questioned about the model later reporting him to police, Reynolds questioned her discomfort, asking, “If she felt uncomfortable why didn’t she find an excuse to leave?”
Reynolds expressed confidence in his own appeal, describing himself as a “brilliant flirt” and claiming that most women found him attractive. He admitted that in later years of his photography career, he became increasingly paranoid about how models might misinterpret his behavior, stating, “I had become so paranoid women were changing. The models were changing. I didn’t have the same trust with them that I used to have.”
Throughout the proceedings, Reynolds maintained his innocence regarding the assault allegations, asserting that his actions were intended to boost the confidence of his models and that all interactions were consensual. He also claimed that his massage practices would differ from his studio behavior, emphasizing that he could not advertise his massage business as “men only,” as police suggested, because it could be misunderstood. Additionally, he cited seasonal affective disorder as a challenge that made it difficult for him to find alternative employment.
In addition to the issues surrounding his massage business, Reynolds, of Poole, had a prior conviction for fraud last year, after failing to inform his business insurers, Hiscox, about his status on the sex offenders register. This breach further complicated his legal standing.
Judge Peter Johnson, presiding over the case, upheld the police’s restrictions and expressed strong disapproval of Reynolds’ attitude towards women. He stated, “It appears Mr Reynolds has a very low opinion of women. He has no respect for them.” The judge described Reynolds’ approach to women as “unhealthy and troubling,” highlighting his “huge ego” and self-described ability as an “extremely competent flirt.” The court also noted Reynolds’ tendency to “talk rubbish endlessly,” a trait he openly acknowledged, which the judge found indicative of his character.
Overall, the case underscores ongoing concerns about Reynolds’ conduct and the measures taken to prevent potential harm, reflecting the serious legal and social implications of his actions in Poole and beyond.
Reynolds publicly described himself at Bournemouth Crown Court as being “like Marmite, you either love it or hate it,” a statement reflecting his polarizing personality. During proceedings, he openly admitted that he would “sail close to the wind” when persuading models to disrobe and pose for photographs, a candid acknowledgment of his provocative approach. Despite this, he denied any intent or danger towards women, asserting that his actions were misunderstood or misrepresented.
His criminal record includes a conviction for sexual assault in 2012, where he was found guilty of touching the breasts and bottom of a 16-year-old girl who was working at his studio in Poole. Following this conviction, Reynolds was placed on the sex offenders register, a legal requirement meant to monitor and restrict his activities. Despite this, he later established a business offering sports massage services in the Ashley Cross area of Poole, raising concerns among authorities.
In response to his new venture, Dorset Police imposed a strict 10-year sexual harm prevention order in November, explicitly banning Reynolds from engaging in any work related to massage or similar services. The police cited concerns that Reynolds was “preoccupied with sex” and posed a potential risk to women, prompting the legal restrictions. Reynolds challenged this order in court, claiming that the police case was “a complete pack of lies.”
During the hearing, Reynolds admitted to telling officers he would “sail close to the wind” in his studio, describing instances where he touched a model’s arm and urged her to unbutton her blouse, allegedly encouraging her to “act sassy.” He defended his actions by stating that models enjoyed coming to his studio because of the “fun” and his “character,” implying that his behavior was part of a playful or flirtatious environment. Reynolds further explained that to get models to look “sexy,” he believed it was necessary to “sail close to the wind,” a statement that raised eyebrows among the court officials.
He also claimed to have a knack for quickly assessing models’ bra sizes, stating, “I have seen a lot of boobs,” which he used to justify his familiarity with female bodies. The court heard that Reynolds had touched another model’s breasts during a “deep massage technique” intended to help her with a supposed breathing problem, a claim he made to justify his actions. When questioned about the model later reporting him to police, Reynolds questioned her discomfort, asking, “If she felt uncomfortable why didn’t she find an excuse to leave?”
Reynolds expressed confidence in his own appeal, describing himself as a “brilliant flirt” and claiming that most women found him attractive. He admitted that in later years of his photography career, he became increasingly paranoid about how models might misinterpret his behavior, stating, “I had become so paranoid women were changing. The models were changing. I didn’t have the same trust with them that I used to have.”
Throughout the proceedings, Reynolds maintained his innocence regarding the assault allegations, asserting that his actions were intended to boost the confidence of his models and that all interactions were consensual. He also claimed that his massage practices would differ from his studio behavior, emphasizing that he could not advertise his massage business as “men only,” as police suggested, because it could be misunderstood. Additionally, he cited seasonal affective disorder as a challenge that made it difficult for him to find alternative employment.
In addition to the issues surrounding his massage business, Reynolds, of Poole, had a prior conviction for fraud last year, after failing to inform his business insurers, Hiscox, about his status on the sex offenders register. This breach further complicated his legal standing.
Judge Peter Johnson, presiding over the case, upheld the police’s restrictions and expressed strong disapproval of Reynolds’ attitude towards women. He stated, “It appears Mr Reynolds has a very low opinion of women. He has no respect for them.” The judge described Reynolds’ approach to women as “unhealthy and troubling,” highlighting his “huge ego” and self-described ability as an “extremely competent flirt.” The court also noted Reynolds’ tendency to “talk rubbish endlessly,” a trait he openly acknowledged, which the judge found indicative of his character.
Overall, the case underscores ongoing concerns about Reynolds’ conduct and the measures taken to prevent potential harm, reflecting the serious legal and social implications of his actions in Poole and beyond.