NEIL COX SKIPTON SEX OFFENDER FAILS TO REGISTER UNDER NEW LAW
In a recent court appearance at Skipton Magistrates Court, Neil Cox, a 50-year-old resident of Cawder Green in Skipton, faced charges related to his failure to comply with the provisions of the Sex Offenders Act 1997.This legislation was enacted to enhance public safety by ensuring that convicted sex offenders maintain a register with local police authorities after their release from incarceration.
Neil Cox, who had previously served a six-year prison sentence for the serious crime of indecently assaulting a 16-year-old girl, was released from prison in January.
Despite the legal requirement to notify the police of his residence and any change of address, Cox did not fulfill this obligation.
The law stipulates that offenders must inform the police of their address if they plan to stay there for more than 14 days, and they are also required to notify the authorities at least 14 days prior to any change of residence.
Prosecutor Sarah Tyrer explained that Cox returned to his family home at Cawder Green without informing the police.
When questioned on February 7, the police inquired about his whereabouts, and Cox admitted that he had not registered his address.
He claimed that he did not receive the necessary registration form from the prison before his release, which he argued was the reason for his failure to comply.
During the hearing, Cox’s defense attorney, John Mewies, requested the court to consider that Cox was not explicitly informed by prison authorities about the registration requirement.
Mewies explained that Cox was presented with several forms to sign upon release, and it was likely that the mistake occurred amidst the confusion.
He further stated that Cox was released on January 12 and was unaware of the registration obligation until police brought it to his attention on February 7.
Once informed, Cox promptly registered his details with the authorities.
In light of the circumstances, the court decided to impose a conditional discharge on Cox for a period of six months.
Additionally, he was ordered to pay costs amounting to £50.
The judge emphasized that, despite the oversight, Cox’s immediate compliance after being informed was noted, and no further action was deemed necessary at this stage.
