MICHAEL WICKS FROM HUTTON SENTENCED FOR SEXUAL OFFENSES IN PRESTON
| Red Rose Database
Hutton Child Sexual Abuser
In a significant case that has drawn considerable attention in the Lancashire area, Michael Wicks, a 31-year-old resident of Skip Lane, Hutton, has been sentenced to a prison term of three years and eight months at Preston Crown Court. The conviction stems from a series of serious criminal acts involving a minor, which Wicks pleaded guilty to last month.
Between February and June 2011, Wicks engaged in a disturbing pattern of sexual activity with a girl who was only 15 years old. The offences took place within the South Ribble district, an area known for its close-knit communities and rural landscapes. The court heard that Wicks’s actions were not only illegal but also deeply manipulative, as he exploited the girl’s vulnerability and youth.
In addition to his prison sentence, the court imposed a Sexual Offences Prevention Order on Wicks, a measure designed to restrict his future contact with minors and prevent any further offending. Furthermore, he was placed on the sex offenders register, a legal requirement for individuals convicted of sexual crimes, ensuring ongoing monitoring and public safety.
As part of the court’s ruling, a restraining order was also issued to prevent Wicks from making any contact with his victim, safeguarding her from further harm. The case highlights the ongoing efforts of law enforcement agencies to combat child sexual exploitation and protect vulnerable children from predatory behavior.
Following the sentencing, Detective Sergeant Vicky Leighton issued a statement emphasizing the gravity of Wicks’s actions. She stated, “Wicks preyed on this young girl and groomed her despite knowing her age and her vulnerability. He was very manipulative and even threatened suicide if she did not keep meeting him. We are dedicated to tackling child sexual exploitation, targeting offenders and helping those children who have become, or are at risk of becoming, victims.”
Police revealed that prior to his arrest, Wicks had been served with a child abduction warning notice on 13 May 2011. This notice explicitly informed him that the victim was under 18 and that he was prohibited from contacting or communicating with her in any way. The case underscores the importance of vigilance and proactive measures in preventing child exploitation and ensuring offenders are held accountable.
Between February and June 2011, Wicks engaged in a disturbing pattern of sexual activity with a girl who was only 15 years old. The offences took place within the South Ribble district, an area known for its close-knit communities and rural landscapes. The court heard that Wicks’s actions were not only illegal but also deeply manipulative, as he exploited the girl’s vulnerability and youth.
In addition to his prison sentence, the court imposed a Sexual Offences Prevention Order on Wicks, a measure designed to restrict his future contact with minors and prevent any further offending. Furthermore, he was placed on the sex offenders register, a legal requirement for individuals convicted of sexual crimes, ensuring ongoing monitoring and public safety.
As part of the court’s ruling, a restraining order was also issued to prevent Wicks from making any contact with his victim, safeguarding her from further harm. The case highlights the ongoing efforts of law enforcement agencies to combat child sexual exploitation and protect vulnerable children from predatory behavior.
Following the sentencing, Detective Sergeant Vicky Leighton issued a statement emphasizing the gravity of Wicks’s actions. She stated, “Wicks preyed on this young girl and groomed her despite knowing her age and her vulnerability. He was very manipulative and even threatened suicide if she did not keep meeting him. We are dedicated to tackling child sexual exploitation, targeting offenders and helping those children who have become, or are at risk of becoming, victims.”
Police revealed that prior to his arrest, Wicks had been served with a child abduction warning notice on 13 May 2011. This notice explicitly informed him that the victim was under 18 and that he was prohibited from contacting or communicating with her in any way. The case underscores the importance of vigilance and proactive measures in preventing child exploitation and ensuring offenders are held accountable.