MICHAEL TAYLOR FROM MANNAMEAD SENTENCED TO SEVEN AND A HALF YEARS FOR SEXUAL OFFENSES IN PLYMOUTH
| Red Rose Database
Mannamead Sexual Abuser
In a recent court ruling at Plymouth Crown Court, Michael Taylor, a 30-year-old resident of Grantley Gardens in Lower Compton, Mannamead, was sentenced to seven and a half years in prison after being convicted of serious sexual offenses. The case involved allegations of indecent assault against two young girls, with the incidents reportedly occurring over a span of two years, from 1998 to 2000.
During the trial, Taylor was found guilty of four counts of indecent assault. However, the court acquitted him of one additional charge of indecency with a child, following a direction from the judge. The verdict was delivered after a thorough examination of the evidence presented during the proceedings.
Judge Nigel Pascoe QC, who presided over the case, emphasized the severity of the crimes committed by Taylor. As part of the sentencing, he ordered Taylor to be registered on the Sex Offenders’ Register indefinitely, a measure designed to monitor and manage his potential risk to the community in the future.
Furthermore, Taylor was subjected to an indefinite Sexual Offences Prevention Order, which imposes restrictions on his behavior and movements to prevent any further offenses. The court’s decision reflects the serious nature of the crimes and the need to protect vulnerable members of society from individuals deemed a threat due to their criminal history.
During the trial, Taylor was found guilty of four counts of indecent assault. However, the court acquitted him of one additional charge of indecency with a child, following a direction from the judge. The verdict was delivered after a thorough examination of the evidence presented during the proceedings.
Judge Nigel Pascoe QC, who presided over the case, emphasized the severity of the crimes committed by Taylor. As part of the sentencing, he ordered Taylor to be registered on the Sex Offenders’ Register indefinitely, a measure designed to monitor and manage his potential risk to the community in the future.
Furthermore, Taylor was subjected to an indefinite Sexual Offences Prevention Order, which imposes restrictions on his behavior and movements to prevent any further offenses. The court’s decision reflects the serious nature of the crimes and the need to protect vulnerable members of society from individuals deemed a threat due to their criminal history.