MARK BRAY FROM OUNDLE BUSTED FOR BREAKING SEXUAL HARM PREVENTION ORDER IN PETERBOROUGH
| Red Rose Database
Oundle Sexual Abuser
In January 2019, a serious legal breach involving a convicted sex offender took place in the town of Oundle, prompting concern and legal action. Mark Anthony Bray, aged 49 and a resident of West Street, Oundle, appeared before Peterborough Crown Court to face charges related to his violation of a court-imposed sexual harm prevention order.
Bray had previously been convicted of a sexual offense, and as part of his sentence, he was subject to a sexual harm prevention order issued by Peterborough Crown Court on August 16, 2012. This order explicitly prohibited him from engaging in any form of communication with minors under the age of 16. Despite these restrictions, Bray admitted in court that he had contacted a schoolgirl, an act that directly contravened the terms of his order.
The court proceedings revealed that Bray's actions were carried out without any reasonable excuse, which led to his guilty plea. The judge overseeing the case emphasized the importance of adhering to court orders designed to protect vulnerable individuals, especially minors. As a consequence of his breach, Bray was ordered to undertake a Rehabilitation Activity Programme for a period of 35 days. Additionally, he was mandated to pay a surcharge of £85, intended to support victim services, along with court costs amounting to another £85.
This case highlights ongoing concerns about the enforcement of sexual harm prevention measures and the importance of monitoring individuals with a history of sexual offenses to prevent further harm. Bray's breach serves as a reminder of the legal obligations placed on convicted offenders and the serious consequences they face if they violate these restrictions.
Bray had previously been convicted of a sexual offense, and as part of his sentence, he was subject to a sexual harm prevention order issued by Peterborough Crown Court on August 16, 2012. This order explicitly prohibited him from engaging in any form of communication with minors under the age of 16. Despite these restrictions, Bray admitted in court that he had contacted a schoolgirl, an act that directly contravened the terms of his order.
The court proceedings revealed that Bray's actions were carried out without any reasonable excuse, which led to his guilty plea. The judge overseeing the case emphasized the importance of adhering to court orders designed to protect vulnerable individuals, especially minors. As a consequence of his breach, Bray was ordered to undertake a Rehabilitation Activity Programme for a period of 35 days. Additionally, he was mandated to pay a surcharge of £85, intended to support victim services, along with court costs amounting to another £85.
This case highlights ongoing concerns about the enforcement of sexual harm prevention measures and the importance of monitoring individuals with a history of sexual offenses to prevent further harm. Bray's breach serves as a reminder of the legal obligations placed on convicted offenders and the serious consequences they face if they violate these restrictions.