LESLEY RAMOTAR'S SHOCK EARLY RELEASE FROM PRISON AFTER 30-YEAR-OLD SEX CRIME IN WENSLEYDALE NEAR BRANSHOLME
| Red Rose Database
Wensleydale Sexual Abuser
In a surprising turn of events, Leslie Ramotar, a 67-year-old man from Wensleydale near Bransholme, has been granted an early release from prison following an appeal against his previous conviction. The case, which dates back over three decades, has resurfaced, bringing to light a disturbing incident from the late 1970s involving a teenage girl.
Leslie Lennox Ramotar was initially sentenced to nine months behind bars at Isleworth Crown Court in July after being found guilty of indecent assault. The conviction stemmed from an incident that occurred more than 30 years ago, during which he was accused of molesting a teenage girl. The details of the case reveal a troubling history that has haunted Ramotar for years, yet his recent legal journey has taken a different turn.
During the appeal hearing, Mr. Justice Dove addressed the court, emphasizing that Ramotar had maintained a clean record in the years following the offense. The judge described the crime as an “isolated offence,” suggesting it was an aberration in an otherwise unblemished life. The court acknowledged that Ramotar had faced ongoing health issues, including diabetes, which may have influenced considerations of his overall circumstances.
Despite recognizing the seriousness of the offence, the judge noted the presence of “aggravating factors,” notably the significant age difference between Ramotar and the victim. Nonetheless, Mr. Justice Dove pointed out that there were several compelling reasons to consider a more lenient sentence. He stated, “There were several other factors strongly supportive of a suspended sentence,” and further remarked that the original sentence was “manifestly excessive” given the circumstances.
As a result, the court replaced the original nine-month prison term with a nine-month sentence that is suspended for two years. The judge explained that this suspension is intended to serve as a warning, ensuring that Ramotar remains under supervision and that the consequences of his actions are acknowledged. “He requires this sentence to be hanging over him to achieve the necessary punishment,” the judge concluded.
This case highlights the complexities involved in balancing justice, rehabilitation, and the passage of time, especially when dealing with historical offences. The decision to release Ramotar early has sparked discussions about the justice system’s approach to old crimes and the importance of considering individual circumstances during sentencing and appeals.
Leslie Lennox Ramotar was initially sentenced to nine months behind bars at Isleworth Crown Court in July after being found guilty of indecent assault. The conviction stemmed from an incident that occurred more than 30 years ago, during which he was accused of molesting a teenage girl. The details of the case reveal a troubling history that has haunted Ramotar for years, yet his recent legal journey has taken a different turn.
During the appeal hearing, Mr. Justice Dove addressed the court, emphasizing that Ramotar had maintained a clean record in the years following the offense. The judge described the crime as an “isolated offence,” suggesting it was an aberration in an otherwise unblemished life. The court acknowledged that Ramotar had faced ongoing health issues, including diabetes, which may have influenced considerations of his overall circumstances.
Despite recognizing the seriousness of the offence, the judge noted the presence of “aggravating factors,” notably the significant age difference between Ramotar and the victim. Nonetheless, Mr. Justice Dove pointed out that there were several compelling reasons to consider a more lenient sentence. He stated, “There were several other factors strongly supportive of a suspended sentence,” and further remarked that the original sentence was “manifestly excessive” given the circumstances.
As a result, the court replaced the original nine-month prison term with a nine-month sentence that is suspended for two years. The judge explained that this suspension is intended to serve as a warning, ensuring that Ramotar remains under supervision and that the consequences of his actions are acknowledged. “He requires this sentence to be hanging over him to achieve the necessary punishment,” the judge concluded.
This case highlights the complexities involved in balancing justice, rehabilitation, and the passage of time, especially when dealing with historical offences. The decision to release Ramotar early has sparked discussions about the justice system’s approach to old crimes and the importance of considering individual circumstances during sentencing and appeals.