KENNETH SENIOR AND SHOCKING CHILD ABUSE IN LEIGHTON AND WHITE WALTHAM
| Red Rose Database
Leighton Sexual Abuser
Kenneth Norman Senior, a former vicar residing at Hope Rd, Leighton, Welshpool, Powys, has been convicted of serious sexual offenses involving a young male choirboy. Senior, aged 62, previously served at a church in White Waltham, where the disturbing incidents took place nearly four decades ago. His guilty plea involved two counts of indecently assaulting a boy under the age of 13, with an additional 22 similar offenses being taken into account during sentencing.
The court proceedings took place at Maidenhead Magistrates' Court, where the prosecuting solicitor, Mrs. Janet Fedrick, provided detailed testimony about the nature of the abuse. According to her, the victim was introduced to the church choir at White Waltham in June 1982. Over the subsequent 18 months to two years, Senior engaged in repetitive acts of indecency, taking advantage of the boy's trust and innocence.
During this period, the boy, who was initially invited to assist with minor tasks around the church, was systematically subjected to inappropriate behavior. Senior would often take the boy to the church’s bell tower, where he engaged in fondling and masturbation. The mother of the victim later revealed that her son was also taken on trips with Senior, including holidays in Tenerife, Fordingbridge, and the New Forest in Hampshire. These trips were also scenes of inappropriate conduct.
The court heard that at no point did Senior expose himself fully to the boy or encourage a mutual sexual relationship. Mrs. Fedrick clarified that there was no coercion or violence involved; rather, the acts stemmed from Senior's apparent affection for the boy. The victim, on the other hand, stated that he did not enjoy these encounters but kept silent out of fear and confusion. He confided in no one during the time, and instead, he would avoid the church practices if possible. It was only recently, during the summer of that year, that he disclosed the abuse to his mother.
Senior's defense lawyer, Mr. Richard Beckett, characterized the case as an unfortunate and tragic episode that imposes a difficult burden on the magistrates. He emphasized that much of the punishment had already been carried out, noting the profound impact on Senior’s family and his personal self-esteem, which had been significantly damaged. He explained that the offending relationship was rooted in a misjudged display of fondness that escalated into a physical relationship, which should never have occurred, especially given Senior’s role of trust.
Mr. Beckett highlighted that the police investigations likely noted the absence of violence or coercion, indicating that the relationship was characterized by affection rather than force. Senior, who had served in the church since his ordination in 1957 after graduating from Leeds University, maintained a longstanding reputation for community service and dedication to his parish. His wife, who suffered a stroke in early November, stood by him throughout the proceedings. Senior was also known to have been involved in local politics, contesting the Hurley ward in the 1979 district council elections as an independent candidate.
Throughout the hearing, Senior expressed remorse and offered a formal apology to the boy and his family. He had previously undergone psychiatric treatment, and his legal team requested that the court consider a lenient sentence, advocating for suspension and recognition of his efforts to seek help and prevent further offenses. The defense underscored the lasting emotional toll on Senior, noting that much of his punishment would continue for the rest of his life.
After the hearing concluded, the Bishop of Reading, the Right Reverend Graham Foley, issued a statement condemning the offending. He acknowledged the grave breach of trust involved and expressed deep sadness over Senior's actions. The bishop revealed that had he been aware of the situation earlier, he would have immediately suspended Senior from his clerical duties. Once the allegations became known through police investigations, Senior resigned his position at White Waltham without delay. The bishop emphasized that the Church’s primary concern now was to support those affected and to restore confidence within the parish community. Everyone involved faced profound suffering, but the Church aimed to begin the process of healing and reconciliation moving forward.
The court proceedings took place at Maidenhead Magistrates' Court, where the prosecuting solicitor, Mrs. Janet Fedrick, provided detailed testimony about the nature of the abuse. According to her, the victim was introduced to the church choir at White Waltham in June 1982. Over the subsequent 18 months to two years, Senior engaged in repetitive acts of indecency, taking advantage of the boy's trust and innocence.
During this period, the boy, who was initially invited to assist with minor tasks around the church, was systematically subjected to inappropriate behavior. Senior would often take the boy to the church’s bell tower, where he engaged in fondling and masturbation. The mother of the victim later revealed that her son was also taken on trips with Senior, including holidays in Tenerife, Fordingbridge, and the New Forest in Hampshire. These trips were also scenes of inappropriate conduct.
The court heard that at no point did Senior expose himself fully to the boy or encourage a mutual sexual relationship. Mrs. Fedrick clarified that there was no coercion or violence involved; rather, the acts stemmed from Senior's apparent affection for the boy. The victim, on the other hand, stated that he did not enjoy these encounters but kept silent out of fear and confusion. He confided in no one during the time, and instead, he would avoid the church practices if possible. It was only recently, during the summer of that year, that he disclosed the abuse to his mother.
Senior's defense lawyer, Mr. Richard Beckett, characterized the case as an unfortunate and tragic episode that imposes a difficult burden on the magistrates. He emphasized that much of the punishment had already been carried out, noting the profound impact on Senior’s family and his personal self-esteem, which had been significantly damaged. He explained that the offending relationship was rooted in a misjudged display of fondness that escalated into a physical relationship, which should never have occurred, especially given Senior’s role of trust.
Mr. Beckett highlighted that the police investigations likely noted the absence of violence or coercion, indicating that the relationship was characterized by affection rather than force. Senior, who had served in the church since his ordination in 1957 after graduating from Leeds University, maintained a longstanding reputation for community service and dedication to his parish. His wife, who suffered a stroke in early November, stood by him throughout the proceedings. Senior was also known to have been involved in local politics, contesting the Hurley ward in the 1979 district council elections as an independent candidate.
Throughout the hearing, Senior expressed remorse and offered a formal apology to the boy and his family. He had previously undergone psychiatric treatment, and his legal team requested that the court consider a lenient sentence, advocating for suspension and recognition of his efforts to seek help and prevent further offenses. The defense underscored the lasting emotional toll on Senior, noting that much of his punishment would continue for the rest of his life.
After the hearing concluded, the Bishop of Reading, the Right Reverend Graham Foley, issued a statement condemning the offending. He acknowledged the grave breach of trust involved and expressed deep sadness over Senior's actions. The bishop revealed that had he been aware of the situation earlier, he would have immediately suspended Senior from his clerical duties. Once the allegations became known through police investigations, Senior resigned his position at White Waltham without delay. The bishop emphasized that the Church’s primary concern now was to support those affected and to restore confidence within the parish community. Everyone involved faced profound suffering, but the Church aimed to begin the process of healing and reconciliation moving forward.