JUSTICE FOR PAUL BLENKEY'S HORRIFIC CRIME IN NORTH YORKSHIRE AND STORY
| Red Rose Database
Story Sexual Abuser
The tragic case of Paul Michael Pearson, a young boy from Saltburn in North Yorkshire, remains one of the most harrowing criminal cases in recent UK history. On August 14th, 1991, seven-year-old Paul disappeared while cycling home after a day of playing with a friend. His sudden and unexplained vanishing sent shockwaves through the local community and prompted a thorough police investigation that would eventually lead to a devastating discovery.
Paul’s bicycle was found abandoned, and his naked body was later recovered from an overgrown ravine approximately fifty feet deep. The area was remote and overgrown, making the search for clues difficult but ultimately fruitful. The following day, authorities identified the location where Paul’s body was discovered, and the investigation quickly focused on a local man named Richard Blenkey.
It was revealed that Blenkey had lured Paul into his chicken hut located on his allotment. Once inside, Blenkey subjected Paul to a sexual assault, stripping him and inflicting further violence. The assault culminated in Blenkey beating Paul about the face and strangling him with chicken thread, a detail that underscored the brutality of the crime. The heinous act left the community in shock and grief, and the case garnered significant media attention across the United Kingdom.
Following the discovery of Paul’s body, Blenkey was arrested two days later. Throughout the legal proceedings, Blenkey maintained his innocence, but correspondence from prison revealed a different story. While on remand, Blenkey exchanged letters with Bernard O’Mahoney, in which he ultimately confessed to the murder. This confession played a crucial role in the subsequent legal process.
On October 26th, 1992, Blenkey was compelled to plead guilty to the charges, and he was sentenced to life imprisonment. The presiding judge recommended that Blenkey serve a minimum of twenty years before being eligible for parole, reflecting the severity of his crimes. As of 2010, Blenkey was approaching his 19th year behind bars and had applied for transfer to an open prison, which would allow him to work within the community, receive additional visits, and prepare for potential parole.
Sources within the police and the victim’s family have expressed concern over Blenkey’s behavior during his incarceration. Reports indicate that during the first eight years of his sentence, Blenkey showed no remorse or signs of rehabilitation. Instead, it appears he has manipulated the prison system to his advantage, working towards open prison status and eventual release. This has raised fears that he may re-enter society without adequate safeguards.
Furthermore, it has come to light that Richard Blenkey had a history of abusing children prior to the murder of Paul Pearson. Despite this, he was never charged with a sexual offence at the time, and as a result, he was not required to register on the sex offenders register. The register, introduced in 1997, contains details of individuals convicted or cautioned for sexual crimes against children or adults. Unfortunately, Blenkey’s offences predated this legislation, leaving a gap in public protection. The victim’s family is now campaigning for legal reforms to ensure that all individuals convicted of sexual offences, regardless of when the offence occurred, are required to register and be monitored.
In light of these concerns, the family is actively advocating for Blenkey to be charged with the sexual offences committed against Paul and for his incarceration to be extended, especially considering his lack of remorse during the initial years of his imprisonment. They fear that if Blenkey is released back into society without proper safeguards, another young child could become his victim, and yet another family could suffer the devastating loss that they have endured. The case continues to evoke strong emotions and calls for justice and reform in the UK’s handling of sexual offenders and child protection laws.
Paul’s bicycle was found abandoned, and his naked body was later recovered from an overgrown ravine approximately fifty feet deep. The area was remote and overgrown, making the search for clues difficult but ultimately fruitful. The following day, authorities identified the location where Paul’s body was discovered, and the investigation quickly focused on a local man named Richard Blenkey.
It was revealed that Blenkey had lured Paul into his chicken hut located on his allotment. Once inside, Blenkey subjected Paul to a sexual assault, stripping him and inflicting further violence. The assault culminated in Blenkey beating Paul about the face and strangling him with chicken thread, a detail that underscored the brutality of the crime. The heinous act left the community in shock and grief, and the case garnered significant media attention across the United Kingdom.
Following the discovery of Paul’s body, Blenkey was arrested two days later. Throughout the legal proceedings, Blenkey maintained his innocence, but correspondence from prison revealed a different story. While on remand, Blenkey exchanged letters with Bernard O’Mahoney, in which he ultimately confessed to the murder. This confession played a crucial role in the subsequent legal process.
On October 26th, 1992, Blenkey was compelled to plead guilty to the charges, and he was sentenced to life imprisonment. The presiding judge recommended that Blenkey serve a minimum of twenty years before being eligible for parole, reflecting the severity of his crimes. As of 2010, Blenkey was approaching his 19th year behind bars and had applied for transfer to an open prison, which would allow him to work within the community, receive additional visits, and prepare for potential parole.
Sources within the police and the victim’s family have expressed concern over Blenkey’s behavior during his incarceration. Reports indicate that during the first eight years of his sentence, Blenkey showed no remorse or signs of rehabilitation. Instead, it appears he has manipulated the prison system to his advantage, working towards open prison status and eventual release. This has raised fears that he may re-enter society without adequate safeguards.
Furthermore, it has come to light that Richard Blenkey had a history of abusing children prior to the murder of Paul Pearson. Despite this, he was never charged with a sexual offence at the time, and as a result, he was not required to register on the sex offenders register. The register, introduced in 1997, contains details of individuals convicted or cautioned for sexual crimes against children or adults. Unfortunately, Blenkey’s offences predated this legislation, leaving a gap in public protection. The victim’s family is now campaigning for legal reforms to ensure that all individuals convicted of sexual offences, regardless of when the offence occurred, are required to register and be monitored.
In light of these concerns, the family is actively advocating for Blenkey to be charged with the sexual offences committed against Paul and for his incarceration to be extended, especially considering his lack of remorse during the initial years of his imprisonment. They fear that if Blenkey is released back into society without proper safeguards, another young child could become his victim, and yet another family could suffer the devastating loss that they have endured. The case continues to evoke strong emotions and calls for justice and reform in the UK’s handling of sexual offenders and child protection laws.