JOHN HODGSON FROM NEW MARSKE ESCAPES JAIL AFTER DOWNLOAD OF OVER 1,000 CHILD INDECENT IMAGES
| Red Rose Database
New Marske Child Sexual Abuser
In a case that has shocked the community of New Marske, John Hodgson, a 51-year-old man, was found guilty of possessing a significant number of indecent images of children but was ultimately spared imprisonment. Hodgson admitted to 16 counts of making indecent photographs of children, with the offences spanning from March 2001 to December 2009.
The incident came to light when authorities executed a search warrant at Hodgson’s family residence on Downfield Way, New Marske, on December 2 of the previous year. During the investigation, law enforcement officials examined Hodgson’s computer hard drive, which revealed a disturbing collection of 1,117 indecent images of minors. The images were classified predominantly in the least severe category, with none falling into the most serious or worst categories, as detailed by prosecutor Jo Kidd during the court proceedings.
At Teesside Crown Court, Judge Peter Fox QC, who presided over the case, addressed Hodgson directly. The judge acknowledged the gravity of the offences but also considered Hodgson’s personal circumstances, which appeared to have played a role in his actions. Judge Fox stated, “You pleaded guilty to a number of offences of making indecent photographs of children. You did that over a period of years. But having regard to your personal circumstances which I judge are important in this case, I judge that you would not have done that sort of thing but for the factors set out in the probation officer’s report.”
In light of these considerations, the judge decided against imposing a custodial sentence. Instead, Hodgson was given a two-year community order that includes supervision and participation in a rehabilitation program. Additionally, he will be required to register as a sex offender for a period of five years. The judge emphasized that Hodgson’s actions appeared to be out of character and expressed hope that he could learn from this experience and move forward without further incident.
Hodgson, who had no prior criminal record, was spared jail time, which has sparked mixed reactions within the local community. The court’s decision underscores the importance of considering individual circumstances in sentencing, even in cases involving serious allegations of child exploitation.
The incident came to light when authorities executed a search warrant at Hodgson’s family residence on Downfield Way, New Marske, on December 2 of the previous year. During the investigation, law enforcement officials examined Hodgson’s computer hard drive, which revealed a disturbing collection of 1,117 indecent images of minors. The images were classified predominantly in the least severe category, with none falling into the most serious or worst categories, as detailed by prosecutor Jo Kidd during the court proceedings.
At Teesside Crown Court, Judge Peter Fox QC, who presided over the case, addressed Hodgson directly. The judge acknowledged the gravity of the offences but also considered Hodgson’s personal circumstances, which appeared to have played a role in his actions. Judge Fox stated, “You pleaded guilty to a number of offences of making indecent photographs of children. You did that over a period of years. But having regard to your personal circumstances which I judge are important in this case, I judge that you would not have done that sort of thing but for the factors set out in the probation officer’s report.”
In light of these considerations, the judge decided against imposing a custodial sentence. Instead, Hodgson was given a two-year community order that includes supervision and participation in a rehabilitation program. Additionally, he will be required to register as a sex offender for a period of five years. The judge emphasized that Hodgson’s actions appeared to be out of character and expressed hope that he could learn from this experience and move forward without further incident.
Hodgson, who had no prior criminal record, was spared jail time, which has sparked mixed reactions within the local community. The court’s decision underscores the importance of considering individual circumstances in sentencing, even in cases involving serious allegations of child exploitation.