JOHN HODGSON FROM NEW MARSKE ESCAPES JAIL AFTER DOWNLOAD OF CHILD INDECENT IMAGES
| Red Rose Database
New Marske Child Sexual Abuser
In a case that has drawn significant attention, John Hodgson, a 51-year-old resident of New Marske, was spared imprisonment despite admitting to possessing a large collection of indecent images of children. The court proceedings revealed that Hodgson had pleaded guilty to 16 counts of making indecent photographs of children, with the offenses spanning from March 2001 to December 2009.
The incident came to light when authorities executed a search warrant at Hodgson’s family residence on Downfield Way, New Marske, on December 2 of the previous year. During the investigation, law enforcement officials analyzed Hodgson’s personal computer and discovered a total of 1,117 indecent images of minors. The prosecutor, Jo Kidd, explained that the majority of these images—1,072—were classified as the least severe category, and none fell into the most serious or worst level of indecency.
Defense attorney Graham Brown addressed the court, providing context about Hodgson’s personal circumstances during the period in question. He explained that Hodgson’s wife had been diagnosed with cancer approximately ten years ago, which marked a particularly traumatic chapter in his life. Brown emphasized that Hodgson was deeply committed to supporting his wife through her illness. Furthermore, he noted that most of the illicit images had been downloaded in the year prior to the court hearing, a time when Hodgson’s wife was suffering from a nervous breakdown.
Brown also highlighted the financial difficulties faced by Hodgson at the time. He revealed that Hodgson was assisting his 29-year-old daughter with substantial legal costs—around £36,000—related to divorce and injunction proceedings following a violent marriage. Additionally, Hodgson had recently been made redundant from his employment, adding to the family’s financial strain. The defense pointed out that the family was under considerable pressure due to ongoing criminal court proceedings.
Mrs. Hodgson was present in court and submitted a letter of support for her husband. Brown further stated that Hodgson had taken steps to delete most of the images—specifically, all but 29 of them—and that these remaining images were not accessible to him. He described the images as predominantly depicting clothed teenagers at the more mature end of the spectrum. Importantly, Brown clarified that there was no evidence to suggest Hodgson had distributed or paid for any of the images.
Judge Peter Fox QC, the Recorder of Middlesbrough, addressed the court, acknowledging Hodgson’s guilty plea and the lengthy period over which the offenses occurred. The judge remarked that Hodgson’s personal circumstances played a significant role in his decision-making process. He stated, “You pleaded guilty to a number of offences of making indecent photographs of children. You did that over a period of years. But having regard to your personal circumstances which I judge are important in this case, I judge that you would not have done that sort of thing but for the factors set out in the probation officer’s report.”
In light of these considerations, Judge Fox decided against imposing a custodial sentence. Instead, Hodgson was given a two-year community order, which includes supervision and participation in a rehabilitation program. Furthermore, he will be required to register as a sex offender for a period of five years. The judge emphasized that Hodgson’s lack of previous convictions and the circumstances of the case contributed to the decision to avoid jail time, expressing hope that Hodgson could learn from this experience and move forward positively.
The incident came to light when authorities executed a search warrant at Hodgson’s family residence on Downfield Way, New Marske, on December 2 of the previous year. During the investigation, law enforcement officials analyzed Hodgson’s personal computer and discovered a total of 1,117 indecent images of minors. The prosecutor, Jo Kidd, explained that the majority of these images—1,072—were classified as the least severe category, and none fell into the most serious or worst level of indecency.
Defense attorney Graham Brown addressed the court, providing context about Hodgson’s personal circumstances during the period in question. He explained that Hodgson’s wife had been diagnosed with cancer approximately ten years ago, which marked a particularly traumatic chapter in his life. Brown emphasized that Hodgson was deeply committed to supporting his wife through her illness. Furthermore, he noted that most of the illicit images had been downloaded in the year prior to the court hearing, a time when Hodgson’s wife was suffering from a nervous breakdown.
Brown also highlighted the financial difficulties faced by Hodgson at the time. He revealed that Hodgson was assisting his 29-year-old daughter with substantial legal costs—around £36,000—related to divorce and injunction proceedings following a violent marriage. Additionally, Hodgson had recently been made redundant from his employment, adding to the family’s financial strain. The defense pointed out that the family was under considerable pressure due to ongoing criminal court proceedings.
Mrs. Hodgson was present in court and submitted a letter of support for her husband. Brown further stated that Hodgson had taken steps to delete most of the images—specifically, all but 29 of them—and that these remaining images were not accessible to him. He described the images as predominantly depicting clothed teenagers at the more mature end of the spectrum. Importantly, Brown clarified that there was no evidence to suggest Hodgson had distributed or paid for any of the images.
Judge Peter Fox QC, the Recorder of Middlesbrough, addressed the court, acknowledging Hodgson’s guilty plea and the lengthy period over which the offenses occurred. The judge remarked that Hodgson’s personal circumstances played a significant role in his decision-making process. He stated, “You pleaded guilty to a number of offences of making indecent photographs of children. You did that over a period of years. But having regard to your personal circumstances which I judge are important in this case, I judge that you would not have done that sort of thing but for the factors set out in the probation officer’s report.”
In light of these considerations, Judge Fox decided against imposing a custodial sentence. Instead, Hodgson was given a two-year community order, which includes supervision and participation in a rehabilitation program. Furthermore, he will be required to register as a sex offender for a period of five years. The judge emphasized that Hodgson’s lack of previous convictions and the circumstances of the case contributed to the decision to avoid jail time, expressing hope that Hodgson could learn from this experience and move forward positively.