JAMES GILDEA FROM GARSTANG SLIPS AWAY WITH SUSPENDED SENTENCE AFTER PRESTON INCIDENT
| Red Rose Database
Garstang Child Sexual Abuser
In a case that has shocked the local community, James Gildea, a 23-year-old resident of Garstang, was brought before Preston Crown Court in connection with disturbing offenses involving a young child and the possession of indecent images. The incident took place in July of the previous year at a public restroom near Fairhaven Lake in Lytham, a popular family destination. The victim, a six-year-old boy, was visiting the area with his family when Gildea targeted him in the restroom, an act that has caused widespread concern and outrage among residents and authorities alike.
Gildea, who was working as a checkout operator at Morrisons and had previously studied at Cardinal Newman College before relocating to Stirling to pursue a degree in international politics, was found to have committed multiple serious offenses. These included filming the young boy in a private setting without consent, an act classified as voyeurism, and downloading indecent images of other minors from the dark web. The investigation also uncovered that Gildea possessed an extreme image involving a horse, adding to the severity of his charges.
During the court proceedings, Gildea admitted to six sexual offenses, including voyeurism, taking indecent photographs of children, and making indecent images of minors. The case was adjourned in April for sentencing, during which the court considered the full extent of his actions and the potential risk posed to the community.
In a decision that has sparked debate, Preston Crown Court sentenced Gildea to 18 months in prison, but the sentence was suspended for two years. As part of his punishment, he was also ordered to complete 25 days of rehabilitation activity and perform 250 hours of unpaid community service. Additionally, Gildea was placed under a Sexual Harm Prevention Order and registered as a sex offender for the next ten years. All devices associated with him, including his phone and laptop, along with the images he possessed, are to be destroyed to prevent further harm.
Despite the gravity of his offenses, Gildea was allowed to walk free under the suspended sentence, a decision that has raised concerns among advocacy groups and local residents about the adequacy of the punishment and the potential risk to children in the community. The case continues to serve as a stark reminder of the importance of vigilance and the need for stringent measures to protect vulnerable individuals from exploitation and abuse.
Gildea, who was working as a checkout operator at Morrisons and had previously studied at Cardinal Newman College before relocating to Stirling to pursue a degree in international politics, was found to have committed multiple serious offenses. These included filming the young boy in a private setting without consent, an act classified as voyeurism, and downloading indecent images of other minors from the dark web. The investigation also uncovered that Gildea possessed an extreme image involving a horse, adding to the severity of his charges.
During the court proceedings, Gildea admitted to six sexual offenses, including voyeurism, taking indecent photographs of children, and making indecent images of minors. The case was adjourned in April for sentencing, during which the court considered the full extent of his actions and the potential risk posed to the community.
In a decision that has sparked debate, Preston Crown Court sentenced Gildea to 18 months in prison, but the sentence was suspended for two years. As part of his punishment, he was also ordered to complete 25 days of rehabilitation activity and perform 250 hours of unpaid community service. Additionally, Gildea was placed under a Sexual Harm Prevention Order and registered as a sex offender for the next ten years. All devices associated with him, including his phone and laptop, along with the images he possessed, are to be destroyed to prevent further harm.
Despite the gravity of his offenses, Gildea was allowed to walk free under the suspended sentence, a decision that has raised concerns among advocacy groups and local residents about the adequacy of the punishment and the potential risk to children in the community. The case continues to serve as a stark reminder of the importance of vigilance and the need for stringent measures to protect vulnerable individuals from exploitation and abuse.