IAN RILEY FROM HAYWARDS HEATH JAILED FOR FILMING SCHOOLCHILDREN IN SUSSEX
| Red Rose Database
Haywards Heath Child Sexual Abuser
In a disturbing case that has shocked the community of Sussex, Ian Fritz Riley, a 25-year-old former teaching assistant from Haywards Heath, has been sentenced to three and a half years in prison for secretly filming schoolchildren as they changed clothes during sports and swimming lessons.
Riley's crimes came to light after a lengthy nine-month investigation conducted by Sussex Police’s paedophile online investigation team. The investigation revealed that Riley had committed a total of 34 offences related to the creation and possession of indecent images on his computer. Of these, 23 offences involved covertly filming children aged between five and ten years old as they changed at four different school premises in Mid-Sussex, including an incident during swimming lessons. The remaining offences involved downloading additional indecent images from the internet, bringing the total to 11 images, which ranged in severity from level one to level five on a scale used to classify such material.
Riley was formally charged on April 27 following the police investigation. It was confirmed that none of the videos involved physical contact with the children, and police stated that the images were classified as level one images, the least serious category. Importantly, there was no evidence to suggest that these images had been distributed or shared beyond the initial filming. The police also clarified that Riley had not engaged in any physical abuse, but his actions nonetheless represented a grave breach of trust and a serious criminal offense.
Following his arrest, police child protection officers visited the families of the affected children to offer support and reassurance. The investigation highlighted the significant breach of trust Riley committed as a teaching assistant, a role that involves close supervision and care of young children. Detective Chief Inspector Nev Kemp emphasized the difficulty of the case, noting the number of children involved and the betrayal of trust by Riley, who was supposed to be a figure of authority and safety.
Riley’s criminal record was thoroughly checked before his appointment to the school, as West Sussex County Council stated. They confirmed that he had undergone the standard criminal checks, which initially showed no reason to suspect his involvement in any misconduct. However, once the offences came to light, authorities took swift action. Riley was also ordered to stay away from any image-making equipment and was placed on the sex offenders register for life.
Stuart Gallimore, the director of operations for children and young people at West Sussex County Council, expressed concern over the case. He stated, “We have worked closely with Sussex Police on looking after the interests of the children involved. Ian Riley passed a Criminal Records Bureau check, and until his offences came to light, there was no reason to suspect him. However, we will be looking closely at the aftermath of this case, to ensure that any lessons are learned.”
Overall, this case has raised serious questions about safeguarding procedures and the importance of vigilance in educational environments. The community and authorities alike are now focused on ensuring that such breaches of trust are prevented in the future, and that the safety and well-being of children remain the top priority.
Riley's crimes came to light after a lengthy nine-month investigation conducted by Sussex Police’s paedophile online investigation team. The investigation revealed that Riley had committed a total of 34 offences related to the creation and possession of indecent images on his computer. Of these, 23 offences involved covertly filming children aged between five and ten years old as they changed at four different school premises in Mid-Sussex, including an incident during swimming lessons. The remaining offences involved downloading additional indecent images from the internet, bringing the total to 11 images, which ranged in severity from level one to level five on a scale used to classify such material.
Riley was formally charged on April 27 following the police investigation. It was confirmed that none of the videos involved physical contact with the children, and police stated that the images were classified as level one images, the least serious category. Importantly, there was no evidence to suggest that these images had been distributed or shared beyond the initial filming. The police also clarified that Riley had not engaged in any physical abuse, but his actions nonetheless represented a grave breach of trust and a serious criminal offense.
Following his arrest, police child protection officers visited the families of the affected children to offer support and reassurance. The investigation highlighted the significant breach of trust Riley committed as a teaching assistant, a role that involves close supervision and care of young children. Detective Chief Inspector Nev Kemp emphasized the difficulty of the case, noting the number of children involved and the betrayal of trust by Riley, who was supposed to be a figure of authority and safety.
Riley’s criminal record was thoroughly checked before his appointment to the school, as West Sussex County Council stated. They confirmed that he had undergone the standard criminal checks, which initially showed no reason to suspect his involvement in any misconduct. However, once the offences came to light, authorities took swift action. Riley was also ordered to stay away from any image-making equipment and was placed on the sex offenders register for life.
Stuart Gallimore, the director of operations for children and young people at West Sussex County Council, expressed concern over the case. He stated, “We have worked closely with Sussex Police on looking after the interests of the children involved. Ian Riley passed a Criminal Records Bureau check, and until his offences came to light, there was no reason to suspect him. However, we will be looking closely at the aftermath of this case, to ensure that any lessons are learned.”
Overall, this case has raised serious questions about safeguarding procedures and the importance of vigilance in educational environments. The community and authorities alike are now focused on ensuring that such breaches of trust are prevented in the future, and that the safety and well-being of children remain the top priority.