HENRY WILSON FROM PENLAN SENTENCED FOR SEXUAL OFFENCES AGAINST CHILD IN SWANSEA
| Red Rose Database
Penlan Child Sexual Abuser
In a case that has shocked the Penlan community, Henry Wilson, aged 47, of St Clears Place, was found guilty of engaging in three separate acts of sexual activity with a minor girl under the age of 16. The court proceedings revealed disturbing details about Wilson's intentions, as it was stated that he aimed to 'cultivate her as a future sexual partner,' a phrase that underscores the predatory nature of his actions.
Initially, Wilson denied all allegations brought against him. However, on the day scheduled for his trial at Swansea Crown Court, he changed his plea to guilty, admitting to the charges. The court was informed that the victim, whose identity remains protected for legal reasons, had made it clear that the abuse had occurred over an extended period, indicating a pattern of ongoing misconduct.
Prosecutor James Jenkins outlined the case, emphasizing that Wilson had made frank admissions regarding his conduct. The court heard that one of the charges involved Wilson attempting to kiss the young girl and pressing his body against hers, actions that contributed to the serious nature of the case. Furthermore, Wilson admitted to indecent touching, specifically touching the girl’s genital area with his own genitalia. However, he denied any form of penetration, asserting that there was no such act involved.
When questioned during his arrest, Wilson initially denied ever assaulting the girl in an indecent manner. The prosecution highlighted that Wilson’s interview with authorities revealed some intellectual limitations, which may have affected his ability to fully explain his actions, a point that was considered during sentencing.
Wilson’s defense lawyer, Ian Wright, acknowledged that the mitigation factors would influence only the length of the custodial sentence rather than any alternative punishment. It was also noted that the abuse appeared to have ceased before the victim formally reported the incidents to authorities.
Judge Huw Davies QC, presiding over the case, emphasized the severity of the offences, stating, “These offences are so serious that nothing other than a significant custodial sentence will suffice.” The judge also pointed out that Wilson had sought to manipulate and groom the victim with the intent of establishing a future sexual relationship.
The court was informed of Wilson’s criminal history, which included a previous conviction at Swansea Magistrates’ Court when he was just 13 years old, for three instances of indecent assault. This history underscored a pattern of concerning behavior from a young age.
As a result of his conviction, Wilson was sentenced to 54 months in prison. Additionally, he was disqualified from working with children indefinitely and was subjected to a sex offences prevention order. This order prohibits him from making contact with the complainant and from having any unsupervised contact with children under the age of 18, aiming to prevent any future harm.
Initially, Wilson denied all allegations brought against him. However, on the day scheduled for his trial at Swansea Crown Court, he changed his plea to guilty, admitting to the charges. The court was informed that the victim, whose identity remains protected for legal reasons, had made it clear that the abuse had occurred over an extended period, indicating a pattern of ongoing misconduct.
Prosecutor James Jenkins outlined the case, emphasizing that Wilson had made frank admissions regarding his conduct. The court heard that one of the charges involved Wilson attempting to kiss the young girl and pressing his body against hers, actions that contributed to the serious nature of the case. Furthermore, Wilson admitted to indecent touching, specifically touching the girl’s genital area with his own genitalia. However, he denied any form of penetration, asserting that there was no such act involved.
When questioned during his arrest, Wilson initially denied ever assaulting the girl in an indecent manner. The prosecution highlighted that Wilson’s interview with authorities revealed some intellectual limitations, which may have affected his ability to fully explain his actions, a point that was considered during sentencing.
Wilson’s defense lawyer, Ian Wright, acknowledged that the mitigation factors would influence only the length of the custodial sentence rather than any alternative punishment. It was also noted that the abuse appeared to have ceased before the victim formally reported the incidents to authorities.
Judge Huw Davies QC, presiding over the case, emphasized the severity of the offences, stating, “These offences are so serious that nothing other than a significant custodial sentence will suffice.” The judge also pointed out that Wilson had sought to manipulate and groom the victim with the intent of establishing a future sexual relationship.
The court was informed of Wilson’s criminal history, which included a previous conviction at Swansea Magistrates’ Court when he was just 13 years old, for three instances of indecent assault. This history underscored a pattern of concerning behavior from a young age.
As a result of his conviction, Wilson was sentenced to 54 months in prison. Additionally, he was disqualified from working with children indefinitely and was subjected to a sex offences prevention order. This order prohibits him from making contact with the complainant and from having any unsupervised contact with children under the age of 18, aiming to prevent any future harm.