GUSTAV DAHM'S HORRIFIC CRIMES IN GOREY, KENMARE, AND RIVERCHAPEL REVEALED

 |  Red Rose Database

Gorey Kenmare Riverchapel Rapist
In a disturbing case that has shocked communities across County Kerry and County Wexford, Gustav Dahm, a convicted paedophile, has once again come under scrutiny for breaching court orders designed to protect children from his predatory behavior. Dahm, whose addresses include Ard na Mara, Pier Road, Kenmare, Co Kerry, and Beachside Glen, Riverchapel, Gorey, Co Wexford, appeared before Judge Carroll Moran at the Circuit Criminal Court in Tralee to face serious allegations of violating court-imposed restrictions.

Evidence presented in court revealed that Dahm had constructed a sinister playground in his garden, which was used as a tool to lure innocent children into his home. The playground was notably equipped with a brightly colored, child-sized train and a life-sized scarecrow, creating an environment that appeared inviting to young children but was, in reality, a trap for abuse. This playground was part of a broader pattern of manipulative behavior that Dahm employed to attract and exploit vulnerable youngsters.

Last week, the 40-year-old was warned by the court that he risked returning to prison unless he strictly adhered to the conditions set by the court. Dahm was previously found to have breached an undertaking that prohibited him from having any unsupervised contact with children. Additionally, he was in violation of an order that barred him from being present at his mother’s guesthouse in County Kerry when guests were present, further demonstrating his disregard for legal restrictions.

Gustav Dahm’s criminal history is extensive and deeply troubling. In October 2006, he was convicted on 23 counts of indecent assault, sexual assault, and gross indecency involving two boys and four girls. These heinous acts spanned over a 17-year period, ending in 2003, and included abuse that took place in various locations, including his family home, his apartment, and nearby woodland areas. The nature of his crimes was particularly disturbing, involving acts such as masturbating in front of his young victims, forcing them to taste his semen, and making lewd comments about the taste resembling ice cream.

Further details revealed that Dahm had installed an elaborate setup in his apartment, complete with expensive disco lights and a sound system, to lure children. He would often give them money, treats, and cigarettes to entice them into his trap. The abuse was often carried out when the children were intoxicated or unable to resist, highlighting the predatory and calculated nature of his offenses. Dahm’s actions were so severe that he was sentenced to ten years in prison, with four years suspended on the condition that he would undergo treatment and adhere to strict conditions, including avoiding any unsupervised contact with children under 17.

He was released from prison late last year and moved to Riverchapel, County Wexford. Despite the court’s restrictions, Dahm was caught speaking to two boys aged between 10 and 13 and kicking a football with them near his residence in April. Wexford-based probation officer Catherine Lambert testified that Dahm engaged in some conversation with the boys and participated in a game of football, but he withdrew from the situation when approached.

Judge Moran issued a stern warning, stating, “If anything like this happens again, it’s possible there will be an application to reactivate the sentence, and it’s also possible that I will do that.” The judge’s words underscored the seriousness of Dahm’s breaches and the potential consequences if he continued to violate court orders.

In a related and equally disturbing case from November 2006, Dahm, then 35 years old, was sentenced to six years in prison after pleading guilty to over 20 counts of indecent and sexual assault, as well as gross indecency involving six children over a 17-year period. The abuse occurred in various locations, including his family home, his apartment, and a disused warehouse. Court records detailed horrifying acts, such as Dahm masturbating in front of a young victim, forcing them to taste his semen, and engaging in sexual acts involving bondage. One particularly shocking incident involved tying up a child in a warehouse before engaging in oral sex, which the judge described as a form of sexual bondage.

The abuse was uncovered after one victim reported the incidents to the Rape Crisis Centre, prompted by concerned relatives. Psychological assessments revealed that Dahm himself had been abused by a visitor to Kenmare during his teenage years, which he claimed contributed to his own abusive behavior. He admitted to psychologists that he began abusing one of his victims shortly after experiencing his own abuse, believing that tolerating the acts would reveal that they were enjoyable. The reports also highlighted that Dahm had been bullied at school, particularly because of his name and German heritage.

During the court hearing, Dahm’s legal representative, barrister John O’Sullivan, argued that continued treatment was in the best interest of the community and that such treatment could not be provided in prison. He also pointed out that Dahm’s early guilty plea allowed for quicker resolution and spared the victims from lengthy court proceedings. Judge Moran acknowledged the complexity of the case, emphasizing that Dahm’s guilty plea was significant and that it brought some measure of closure for the victims and society.

Nevertheless, the judge condemned Dahm’s actions, describing his offenses as a continuous sequence of “debauchery” over 17 years involving six victims, four of whom were very young. The court sentenced him to ten years in prison, suspending the last four years on the condition that he undergo treatment and comply with probation directives. Dahm was ordered not to have any unsupervised contact with children under 17 and to obey all conditions set by probation services. Throughout the sentencing, Dahm showed no emotion, dressed in a navy suit, as several victims and family members looked on in court.
← Back to search results