DOUGLAS HANNING FROM EAST KILBRIDE CAUGHT WITH OVER 1000 CHILD ABUSE IMAGES
| Red Rose Database
East Kilbride Child Sexual Abuser
In a disturbing case that has shocked the community of East Kilbride, Douglas Hanning, a 56-year-old man, was found to be in possession of a staggering collection of indecent images of children. The authorities uncovered that Hanning had stored a total of 1,086 such images on personal computers located within his residence in Westwood, East Kilbride, spanning a period from January 1, 2008, to June 2, 2010.
The case came to light after police investigations linked Hanning’s online activity to illegal content. The Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP) detected suspicious activity originating from Hanning’s IP address, which was associated with accessing and downloading indecent images of children. This led to a warrant being issued for his arrest, and law enforcement officers promptly executed the search at his home on June 2, 2010, in Blenheim Avenue, East Kilbride.
At the time of the search, Hanning was alone in his house. He was cautioned by officers, and a thorough search was conducted. During the forensic examination of a computer found in his bedroom, investigators discovered 105 indecent images of children. Further analysis revealed that Hanning had also conducted online searches using terms such as ‘pigtail heaven,’ ‘child models,’ ‘school models,’ and ‘pre-teen models,’ which are indicative of his disturbing interests. Additionally, another electronic device in his bedroom contained 981 indecent images, most of which were classified at the lowest level of indecency, although some images were at the highest level of depravity.
Hanning’s actions and possession of these images prompted a court appearance, where he faced charges of possessing indecent images of children. During the proceedings, his defense lawyer, Rhonda Anderson, acknowledged the gravity of the situation. She emphasized that the images were not accessible to others and were kept solely for personal use. Anderson also stated that Hanning recognized the seriousness of his actions and expressed remorse, describing her client as being thoroughly ashamed of his behavior.
In court, Hanning pleaded guilty to an amended charge related to the possession of indecent images of children. The judge, Sheriff Joyce Powrie, decided that a probation order was appropriate given that most of the images were at the lowest level of indecency and considering Hanning’s status as a first-time offender. She ordered that Hanning be placed on probation for three years and registered as a sex offender for the same duration. Furthermore, he was mandated to participate in a community sex offender groupwork program.
While the sentence was deferred until July 22 for further reports, including a risk assessment, Hanning was immediately placed on the sex offenders’ register. This case highlights the ongoing efforts of law enforcement agencies to combat online child exploitation and the importance of vigilance in protecting vulnerable children from such heinous crimes.
The case came to light after police investigations linked Hanning’s online activity to illegal content. The Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP) detected suspicious activity originating from Hanning’s IP address, which was associated with accessing and downloading indecent images of children. This led to a warrant being issued for his arrest, and law enforcement officers promptly executed the search at his home on June 2, 2010, in Blenheim Avenue, East Kilbride.
At the time of the search, Hanning was alone in his house. He was cautioned by officers, and a thorough search was conducted. During the forensic examination of a computer found in his bedroom, investigators discovered 105 indecent images of children. Further analysis revealed that Hanning had also conducted online searches using terms such as ‘pigtail heaven,’ ‘child models,’ ‘school models,’ and ‘pre-teen models,’ which are indicative of his disturbing interests. Additionally, another electronic device in his bedroom contained 981 indecent images, most of which were classified at the lowest level of indecency, although some images were at the highest level of depravity.
Hanning’s actions and possession of these images prompted a court appearance, where he faced charges of possessing indecent images of children. During the proceedings, his defense lawyer, Rhonda Anderson, acknowledged the gravity of the situation. She emphasized that the images were not accessible to others and were kept solely for personal use. Anderson also stated that Hanning recognized the seriousness of his actions and expressed remorse, describing her client as being thoroughly ashamed of his behavior.
In court, Hanning pleaded guilty to an amended charge related to the possession of indecent images of children. The judge, Sheriff Joyce Powrie, decided that a probation order was appropriate given that most of the images were at the lowest level of indecency and considering Hanning’s status as a first-time offender. She ordered that Hanning be placed on probation for three years and registered as a sex offender for the same duration. Furthermore, he was mandated to participate in a community sex offender groupwork program.
While the sentence was deferred until July 22 for further reports, including a risk assessment, Hanning was immediately placed on the sex offenders’ register. This case highlights the ongoing efforts of law enforcement agencies to combat online child exploitation and the importance of vigilance in protecting vulnerable children from such heinous crimes.