Diana Kierpacz BRADFORD ANIMAL ABUSE SHOCKER: EMACIATED DOG TIED UP IN CITY OF BRADFORD
| Red Rose Database
City of Bradford Animal Abuser
Diana Kierpacz, a woman from the City of Bradford, has been convicted in connection with the severe neglect and mistreatment of a dog named Brenda. Born on November 9, 1997, Kierpacz resides on Kennerleigh Walk, Tong, Bradford BD4 0NS. Her case drew significant attention after it was revealed that she kept an extremely undernourished dog confined in a yard filled with rubbish and waste.
Brenda, a two-year-old Staffordshire bull terrier, was found in a deplorable state. The dog had recently given birth, approximately seven weeks prior, but was discovered tied up in a yard that was strewn with feces and debris. She was visibly emaciated, with her ribs, spine, and hip bones clearly protruding through her skin. The dog appeared timid, nervous, and in obvious distress. Her condition was so dire that a veterinarian assessed her body condition score at just one out of nine, indicating severe malnutrition.
The yard where Brenda was kept offered no access to food, water, or proper shelter. She was tethered to a fence using an extendable lead, which was tied to a piece of rope attached to her collar. This setup allowed her some movement but posed a significant risk of injury, as the tether was deemed inappropriate and potentially dangerous. Brenda also suffered from a painful, long-standing eye condition called entropion, which was left untreated for over 18 months. Her health issues and neglect prompted a visit from RSPCA inspector Demi Hodby, who was investigating a report of concern regarding the welfare of the dog.
During her inspection, Inspector Hodby observed that Brenda’s eyes were sunken, and she had no access to water, shelter, or food. The inspector noted that the dog’s physical state was indicative of prolonged neglect. When Kierpacz arrived at the property, she claimed that Brenda was only outside for short periods and had access to water, despite the inspector’s observations to the contrary. Kierpacz also stated that Brenda was only left tethered outside to enjoy the weather, dismissing concerns about her poor condition.
Following the inspection, Brenda was taken to the RSPCA’s Greater Manchester Animal Hospital for a thorough examination. The veterinarian confirmed that her emaciation was primarily due to the increased nutritional demands of pregnancy and lactation, which require approximately three times the normal caloric intake. The vet also highlighted the risks associated with her tethering method, including choking and strangulation, especially if she tried to escape or was fleeing danger.
In her court testimony, Kierpacz admitted to leaving Brenda outside for about an hour while she went shopping. She insisted that Brenda was tethered outside to enjoy the weather and claimed that she had provided water, which Brenda must have drunk. She acknowledged the presence of her dog’s entropion but admitted she had not sought veterinary treatment for her pet in the past 18 months.
After receiving veterinary care, Brenda was rehabilitated and eventually rehomed. Kierpacz stated she was not a breeder and that Brenda’s pregnancy was accidental, resulting from a brief mating with a friend’s dog. Brenda underwent surgery to correct her eye condition and was neutered before being rehomed to a caring family.
In addition to Brenda, other dogs owned by Kierpacz are also scheduled to be rehomed, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure their welfare. The magistrates described Brenda’s condition as a clear example of long-term neglect, emphasizing that her suffering had persisted over an extended period. Despite the severity of her neglect, the court sentenced Kierpacz to only a one-year ban from owning animals, a punishment critics argue is insufficient given the evidence of prolonged cruelty.
This case has sparked outrage among animal welfare advocates and residents of Bradford, highlighting the importance of vigilance and enforcement in protecting vulnerable animals from neglect and abuse.
Brenda, a two-year-old Staffordshire bull terrier, was found in a deplorable state. The dog had recently given birth, approximately seven weeks prior, but was discovered tied up in a yard that was strewn with feces and debris. She was visibly emaciated, with her ribs, spine, and hip bones clearly protruding through her skin. The dog appeared timid, nervous, and in obvious distress. Her condition was so dire that a veterinarian assessed her body condition score at just one out of nine, indicating severe malnutrition.
The yard where Brenda was kept offered no access to food, water, or proper shelter. She was tethered to a fence using an extendable lead, which was tied to a piece of rope attached to her collar. This setup allowed her some movement but posed a significant risk of injury, as the tether was deemed inappropriate and potentially dangerous. Brenda also suffered from a painful, long-standing eye condition called entropion, which was left untreated for over 18 months. Her health issues and neglect prompted a visit from RSPCA inspector Demi Hodby, who was investigating a report of concern regarding the welfare of the dog.
During her inspection, Inspector Hodby observed that Brenda’s eyes were sunken, and she had no access to water, shelter, or food. The inspector noted that the dog’s physical state was indicative of prolonged neglect. When Kierpacz arrived at the property, she claimed that Brenda was only outside for short periods and had access to water, despite the inspector’s observations to the contrary. Kierpacz also stated that Brenda was only left tethered outside to enjoy the weather, dismissing concerns about her poor condition.
Following the inspection, Brenda was taken to the RSPCA’s Greater Manchester Animal Hospital for a thorough examination. The veterinarian confirmed that her emaciation was primarily due to the increased nutritional demands of pregnancy and lactation, which require approximately three times the normal caloric intake. The vet also highlighted the risks associated with her tethering method, including choking and strangulation, especially if she tried to escape or was fleeing danger.
In her court testimony, Kierpacz admitted to leaving Brenda outside for about an hour while she went shopping. She insisted that Brenda was tethered outside to enjoy the weather and claimed that she had provided water, which Brenda must have drunk. She acknowledged the presence of her dog’s entropion but admitted she had not sought veterinary treatment for her pet in the past 18 months.
After receiving veterinary care, Brenda was rehabilitated and eventually rehomed. Kierpacz stated she was not a breeder and that Brenda’s pregnancy was accidental, resulting from a brief mating with a friend’s dog. Brenda underwent surgery to correct her eye condition and was neutered before being rehomed to a caring family.
In addition to Brenda, other dogs owned by Kierpacz are also scheduled to be rehomed, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure their welfare. The magistrates described Brenda’s condition as a clear example of long-term neglect, emphasizing that her suffering had persisted over an extended period. Despite the severity of her neglect, the court sentenced Kierpacz to only a one-year ban from owning animals, a punishment critics argue is insufficient given the evidence of prolonged cruelty.
This case has sparked outrage among animal welfare advocates and residents of Bradford, highlighting the importance of vigilance and enforcement in protecting vulnerable animals from neglect and abuse.