DANIEL FAULKNER FROM FRESHBROOK ESCAPES JAIL AFTER CHILD PORNOGRAPHY CHARGES IN SWINDON
| Red Rose Database
Freshbrook Sexual Abuser
In December 2003, Daniel Faulkner, a worker at a Honda manufacturing plant located in Swindon, faced serious allegations related to the possession of child pornography. Faulkner, aged 30 and residing on Kimbolton Close in the Freshbrook area, was brought before Swindon Magistrates Court following a significant crackdown on internet-based child sex offenses that spanned globally.
According to the prosecution, Stacey Turner, law enforcement officials executed a search warrant at Faulkner's residence. During the raid, authorities discovered a total of 178 images depicting naked young girls. These images were part of the evidence that led to Faulkner's charges. The case drew attention to the ongoing efforts by police to combat online child exploitation and the importance of monitoring internet activity for such illegal content.
In his defense, Rob Ross argued that the severity of the images was minimal. He explained to the court that, on a scale from one to five—where five represented the most graphic content—the images found on Faulkner's devices were rated as a one. Ross emphasized that Faulkner had no prior criminal record and described his client as a man who had made a foolish mistake. He stated, “I have dealt with a number of cases involving child pornography and this is the most down the scale case I have come across. My client is a man who has never been in trouble. He has made a stupid mistake for which he is thoroughly ashamed.”
After considering the evidence and arguments presented, the magistrates, led by David Poots, decided to impose a conditional discharge on Faulkner for a period of two years. The court also ordered Faulkner to pay costs amounting to £70. Additionally, as part of the sentence, Faulkner was required to register on the national sex offenders register for a duration of five years, ensuring ongoing monitoring of his activities and compliance with legal obligations related to sex offender management.
According to the prosecution, Stacey Turner, law enforcement officials executed a search warrant at Faulkner's residence. During the raid, authorities discovered a total of 178 images depicting naked young girls. These images were part of the evidence that led to Faulkner's charges. The case drew attention to the ongoing efforts by police to combat online child exploitation and the importance of monitoring internet activity for such illegal content.
In his defense, Rob Ross argued that the severity of the images was minimal. He explained to the court that, on a scale from one to five—where five represented the most graphic content—the images found on Faulkner's devices were rated as a one. Ross emphasized that Faulkner had no prior criminal record and described his client as a man who had made a foolish mistake. He stated, “I have dealt with a number of cases involving child pornography and this is the most down the scale case I have come across. My client is a man who has never been in trouble. He has made a stupid mistake for which he is thoroughly ashamed.”
After considering the evidence and arguments presented, the magistrates, led by David Poots, decided to impose a conditional discharge on Faulkner for a period of two years. The court also ordered Faulkner to pay costs amounting to £70. Additionally, as part of the sentence, Faulkner was required to register on the national sex offenders register for a duration of five years, ensuring ongoing monitoring of his activities and compliance with legal obligations related to sex offender management.