COLIN PEARCE SLough PAEDOPHILE SPARED JAIL DESPITE VILE ONLINE CHATROOM COMMENTS
| Red Rose Database
Slough Child Sexual Abuser
In January 2018, a disturbing case emerged involving Colin Pearce, a resident of Rivington Apartments on Railway Terrace in Slough, who engaged in online conversations with other men about disturbing and depraved fantasies involving children. Pearce, aged 66 at the time, was found to have made utterly vile remarks about what he would like to do to young people during these chatroom exchanges, revealing a disturbing preoccupation with child abuse.
Further compounding his criminal behavior, Pearce possessed graphic and explicit images depicting children being subjected to sexual abuse. These images, which are considered obscene material, formed part of the charges brought against him. Pearce faced multiple counts in court, including four counts of publishing obscene material, three counts of possessing indecent images of children, and three counts of possessing obscene articles.
The case was heard at Reading Crown Court, where Deputy Circuit Judge Alistair McCreath delivered a stern warning about the seriousness of such offenses. He emphasized that looking at these types of images is not a trivial matter, stating, “The children in the two videos you had were real children being sexually abused for the benefit of those who like to look at them. People who look at those images are complicit in the abuse, just as much as those who create them. The images would not exist were it not for the fact that people like you are gratified by looking at the vile content.”
Despite the gravity of his actions, Pearce was sentenced to nine months in prison, but the sentence was suspended for two years. As part of his sentence, he was also ordered to complete 40 days of rehabilitation sessions aimed at addressing his behavior. Additionally, a Sexual Harm Prevention Order was imposed to restrict his activities, and he was ordered to pay court costs amounting to £1,500.
Judge McCreath further remarked on the nature of the offenses, noting that downloading such images often involves batch downloads, making the crimes far from trivial. He described the chatroom conversations as revolting, especially given Pearce’s pre-existing tendencies. The judge explained that while no actual harm was done in this case, the discussions and fantasies expressed were deeply disturbing. “This case is different because the people you spoke to were not children, but all of you were sitting there and fantasizing about what you would like to do to children,” he said.
Finally, Pearce was informed that he would be placed on the Sex Offenders’ Register for a period of ten years, reflecting the ongoing concern about his potential risk to the community. The court’s verdict underscores the serious stance taken against online child exploitation and the importance of monitoring and punishing such heinous conduct.
Further compounding his criminal behavior, Pearce possessed graphic and explicit images depicting children being subjected to sexual abuse. These images, which are considered obscene material, formed part of the charges brought against him. Pearce faced multiple counts in court, including four counts of publishing obscene material, three counts of possessing indecent images of children, and three counts of possessing obscene articles.
The case was heard at Reading Crown Court, where Deputy Circuit Judge Alistair McCreath delivered a stern warning about the seriousness of such offenses. He emphasized that looking at these types of images is not a trivial matter, stating, “The children in the two videos you had were real children being sexually abused for the benefit of those who like to look at them. People who look at those images are complicit in the abuse, just as much as those who create them. The images would not exist were it not for the fact that people like you are gratified by looking at the vile content.”
Despite the gravity of his actions, Pearce was sentenced to nine months in prison, but the sentence was suspended for two years. As part of his sentence, he was also ordered to complete 40 days of rehabilitation sessions aimed at addressing his behavior. Additionally, a Sexual Harm Prevention Order was imposed to restrict his activities, and he was ordered to pay court costs amounting to £1,500.
Judge McCreath further remarked on the nature of the offenses, noting that downloading such images often involves batch downloads, making the crimes far from trivial. He described the chatroom conversations as revolting, especially given Pearce’s pre-existing tendencies. The judge explained that while no actual harm was done in this case, the discussions and fantasies expressed were deeply disturbing. “This case is different because the people you spoke to were not children, but all of you were sitting there and fantasizing about what you would like to do to children,” he said.
Finally, Pearce was informed that he would be placed on the Sex Offenders’ Register for a period of ten years, reflecting the ongoing concern about his potential risk to the community. The court’s verdict underscores the serious stance taken against online child exploitation and the importance of monitoring and punishing such heinous conduct.