ANTHONY ALLISON FROM WARLINGHAM CAUGHT WITH OVER 1,400 CHILD ABUSE IMAGES IN SHOCKING CASE
| Red Rose Database
Warlingham Sexual Abuser
In a disturbing case that has sent shockwaves through the community of Warlingham, Anthony Allison, a 50-year-old resident of Farm Road, has pleaded guilty to possessing and downloading a staggering collection of more than 1,400 images depicting child abuse. The details of the case emerged during a hearing at Guildford Crown Court on a recent Friday, revealing the extent of Allison’s alleged involvement in this heinous activity.
According to court records, Allison faced six counts related to the creation and possession of child pornography. These charges ranged from over 800 images classified as Level A, which include the most severe forms such as those involving penetration, sadism, or animals, to more than 130 images categorized as Level C, which involve sexual depictions of children. The court was informed that the images also included films, further emphasizing the gravity of the offense.
During the proceedings, Allison’s defense counsel, Sarah Lindop, explained to the court that her client, often described as a “family man” with no prior criminal record, had transitioned from viewing adult pornography online to accessing child abuse images. She noted that Allison had initially downloaded the images without fully understanding the legal implications, emphasizing that the act of downloading the images constituted the creation of such material under the law.
Ms. Lindop stated, “I have told Mr. Allison that by double-clicking and downloading the images, he is making the image. It is quite difficult for members of the public to understand.” She also clarified that while Allison had indeed downloaded the images, there was some dispute over whether he had viewed all of them in their entirety, suggesting a possible distinction in the level of culpability.
She further highlighted that there was “significant mitigation” in Allison’s case, noting that he sometimes downloaded images without checking their titles, which could suggest a lack of intent to view or distribute certain content. The defense requested that the court consider a non-custodial sentence, arguing that Allison’s progression from adult to child abuse images was not uncommon and that he was remorseful.
However, the presiding judge, Recorder Peter Crabtree, issued a stern warning to Allison about the potential consequences of his actions. He emphasized the seriousness of the offense, stating, “The titles of the movies that were downloaded indicate a range of young, teenage, and pre-pubescent children as young as two, three, or four, and children being abused in the highest possible category. There are significant aggravating factors.”
Judge Crabtree underscored the devastating impact of such crimes, remarking, “By downloading these images, you are involved in a cycle that destroys the lives of children forced into these situations.” He pointed out that Allison’s guilty plea involved not only images but also moving footage, with a large number of the content at the highest levels involving very young children.
As a result of his guilty plea, Allison was ordered to register as a sex offender and was released on unconditional bail. He is scheduled to return to Guildford Crown Court for sentencing on August 29. The case has raised serious concerns about the prevalence of such crimes and the importance of vigilance in protecting vulnerable children from exploitation and abuse.
According to court records, Allison faced six counts related to the creation and possession of child pornography. These charges ranged from over 800 images classified as Level A, which include the most severe forms such as those involving penetration, sadism, or animals, to more than 130 images categorized as Level C, which involve sexual depictions of children. The court was informed that the images also included films, further emphasizing the gravity of the offense.
During the proceedings, Allison’s defense counsel, Sarah Lindop, explained to the court that her client, often described as a “family man” with no prior criminal record, had transitioned from viewing adult pornography online to accessing child abuse images. She noted that Allison had initially downloaded the images without fully understanding the legal implications, emphasizing that the act of downloading the images constituted the creation of such material under the law.
Ms. Lindop stated, “I have told Mr. Allison that by double-clicking and downloading the images, he is making the image. It is quite difficult for members of the public to understand.” She also clarified that while Allison had indeed downloaded the images, there was some dispute over whether he had viewed all of them in their entirety, suggesting a possible distinction in the level of culpability.
She further highlighted that there was “significant mitigation” in Allison’s case, noting that he sometimes downloaded images without checking their titles, which could suggest a lack of intent to view or distribute certain content. The defense requested that the court consider a non-custodial sentence, arguing that Allison’s progression from adult to child abuse images was not uncommon and that he was remorseful.
However, the presiding judge, Recorder Peter Crabtree, issued a stern warning to Allison about the potential consequences of his actions. He emphasized the seriousness of the offense, stating, “The titles of the movies that were downloaded indicate a range of young, teenage, and pre-pubescent children as young as two, three, or four, and children being abused in the highest possible category. There are significant aggravating factors.”
Judge Crabtree underscored the devastating impact of such crimes, remarking, “By downloading these images, you are involved in a cycle that destroys the lives of children forced into these situations.” He pointed out that Allison’s guilty plea involved not only images but also moving footage, with a large number of the content at the highest levels involving very young children.
As a result of his guilty plea, Allison was ordered to register as a sex offender and was released on unconditional bail. He is scheduled to return to Guildford Crown Court for sentencing on August 29. The case has raised serious concerns about the prevalence of such crimes and the importance of vigilance in protecting vulnerable children from exploitation and abuse.