ANDREW THURSTANCE SENTENCED IN BIRMINGHAM FOR SEXUAL OFFENSES INVOLVING 13-YEAR-OLD GIRL
| Red Rose Database
Birmingham Sexual Abuser
In a case that has raised serious concerns about online safety and the exploitation of minors, Andrew Thurstance, a 19-year-old resident of Birmingham, has been sentenced to six months in a detention center following his conviction for sexually abusing a 13-year-old girl. The incident came to light after Thurstance engaged in a disturbing online relationship with the young girl, whom he met through an internet chat room.
During the proceedings at Birmingham Crown Court, Judge Richard Griffith Jones expressed his deep concern regarding the increasing exploitation of children via the internet. He emphasized the gravity of such cases by stating, 'There is such concern over the exploitation of young children through meeting on the Internet. You were dealing with someone who really was a child. She was only just 13 and you indulged your sexual gratification with a child.' The judge's remarks underscored the serious nature of the offense and the vulnerability of minors in digital spaces.
As part of his sentence, Thurstance was also ordered to register as a sex offender for the next five years, a standard legal requirement for such offenses. The court heard that Thurstance, who hails from Bourlay Close, Frankley, pleaded guilty to charges of gross indecency with a child and indecent assault. Prosecutor Graham Henson explained that the victim likely lied about her age to gain access to the chat forum, which was restricted to users over 16. The young girl had initiated contact through messages, and Thurstance continued to communicate with her over several days via the internet and text messages on his phone.
According to the prosecution, after two failed attempts to meet in person, the pair finally arranged to meet in a park in Frankley. Their initial contact involved kissing and heavy petting, which eventually escalated to sexual acts. The relationship was uncovered when the girl’s parents became aware of her interactions and discovered the nature of her online communications and subsequent meeting with Thurstance.
Defense attorney Antonie Muller attempted to provide some context for Thurstance’s actions, claiming that he was 'at a low ebb' following a recent romantic breakup. Muller argued that Thurstance believed only engaging in full intercourse with a girl under 16 was illegal, and was unaware that other sexual acts could also constitute a criminal offense. Despite this defense, the court found Thurstance’s actions to be serious and deserving of the sentence handed down.
This case highlights the dangers associated with online interactions, especially involving minors, and serves as a stark reminder of the legal consequences that can follow sex offenses involving children. Authorities continue to warn parents and young people about the risks of digital communication and the importance of safeguarding personal information online.
During the proceedings at Birmingham Crown Court, Judge Richard Griffith Jones expressed his deep concern regarding the increasing exploitation of children via the internet. He emphasized the gravity of such cases by stating, 'There is such concern over the exploitation of young children through meeting on the Internet. You were dealing with someone who really was a child. She was only just 13 and you indulged your sexual gratification with a child.' The judge's remarks underscored the serious nature of the offense and the vulnerability of minors in digital spaces.
As part of his sentence, Thurstance was also ordered to register as a sex offender for the next five years, a standard legal requirement for such offenses. The court heard that Thurstance, who hails from Bourlay Close, Frankley, pleaded guilty to charges of gross indecency with a child and indecent assault. Prosecutor Graham Henson explained that the victim likely lied about her age to gain access to the chat forum, which was restricted to users over 16. The young girl had initiated contact through messages, and Thurstance continued to communicate with her over several days via the internet and text messages on his phone.
According to the prosecution, after two failed attempts to meet in person, the pair finally arranged to meet in a park in Frankley. Their initial contact involved kissing and heavy petting, which eventually escalated to sexual acts. The relationship was uncovered when the girl’s parents became aware of her interactions and discovered the nature of her online communications and subsequent meeting with Thurstance.
Defense attorney Antonie Muller attempted to provide some context for Thurstance’s actions, claiming that he was 'at a low ebb' following a recent romantic breakup. Muller argued that Thurstance believed only engaging in full intercourse with a girl under 16 was illegal, and was unaware that other sexual acts could also constitute a criminal offense. Despite this defense, the court found Thurstance’s actions to be serious and deserving of the sentence handed down.
This case highlights the dangers associated with online interactions, especially involving minors, and serves as a stark reminder of the legal consequences that can follow sex offenses involving children. Authorities continue to warn parents and young people about the risks of digital communication and the importance of safeguarding personal information online.