ANDREW MARSH FROM NEWPORT SENTENCED FOR CHILD SEX IMAGE POSSESSION IN CARDIFF
| Red Rose Database
Newport Child Sexual Abuser
In a case that has sent shockwaves through the Newport community, Andrew Marsh, a 49-year-old resident of Newport, was brought before Cardiff Crown Court to face serious allegations related to the possession of indecent images of children. The proceedings revealed that Marsh had been found with a significant collection of such images stored on his mobile phone, leading to a conviction that has resulted in a combination of community service, registration as a sex offender, and strict restrictions on his future conduct.
According to court records, Marsh had earlier pleaded guilty to 11 counts of possessing indecent images of children. The case was initiated after police officers executed a search warrant at his residence on Whitstone Road in Newport. The investigation was triggered by a message Marsh left on a gay chat line, in which he claimed to have sexually abused a boy. However, this particular allegation was never substantiated by evidence, and no charges related to that claim were pursued.
During the police raid, officers discovered a total of 56 images on Marsh’s mobile device. These images were categorized into different levels of severity, with one classified as level five, indicating sadistic content. Thirteen images fell into level four, while the remaining images were spread across levels one, two, and three, reflecting varying degrees of indecency. Marsh admitted during police interviews that the phone belonged solely to him and that no one else had access to it. He explained that the images had been sent to him by a man he had met on the gay chat line, asserting that he had no personal interest in the content and merely clicked through the images.
It was noted that Marsh had no previous criminal record or cautions related to such offenses. His defense lawyer, Stephen Jearey, described Marsh as a hardworking, stable individual who had led an ordinary life. Jearey emphasized that Marsh was a decent man, despite the serious nature of the charges.
In sentencing, Recorder David Aubrey ordered Marsh to complete a three-year community order and a three-year supervision order. The judge warned Marsh that if he appeared before the court again, he would face immediate custody, stating, “If you come back before me, you will not get another chance, you will go to custody.”
Furthermore, Marsh was mandated to register as a sex offender for five years. He was also prohibited from working with children under 18 indefinitely and was barred from having unsupervised contact with anyone under 18 unless accompanied by a parent or guardian. The restrictions did not apply to unavoidable contact in public places. The police confiscated Marsh’s mobile phone, which was subsequently destroyed as part of the case proceedings.
According to court records, Marsh had earlier pleaded guilty to 11 counts of possessing indecent images of children. The case was initiated after police officers executed a search warrant at his residence on Whitstone Road in Newport. The investigation was triggered by a message Marsh left on a gay chat line, in which he claimed to have sexually abused a boy. However, this particular allegation was never substantiated by evidence, and no charges related to that claim were pursued.
During the police raid, officers discovered a total of 56 images on Marsh’s mobile device. These images were categorized into different levels of severity, with one classified as level five, indicating sadistic content. Thirteen images fell into level four, while the remaining images were spread across levels one, two, and three, reflecting varying degrees of indecency. Marsh admitted during police interviews that the phone belonged solely to him and that no one else had access to it. He explained that the images had been sent to him by a man he had met on the gay chat line, asserting that he had no personal interest in the content and merely clicked through the images.
It was noted that Marsh had no previous criminal record or cautions related to such offenses. His defense lawyer, Stephen Jearey, described Marsh as a hardworking, stable individual who had led an ordinary life. Jearey emphasized that Marsh was a decent man, despite the serious nature of the charges.
In sentencing, Recorder David Aubrey ordered Marsh to complete a three-year community order and a three-year supervision order. The judge warned Marsh that if he appeared before the court again, he would face immediate custody, stating, “If you come back before me, you will not get another chance, you will go to custody.”
Furthermore, Marsh was mandated to register as a sex offender for five years. He was also prohibited from working with children under 18 indefinitely and was barred from having unsupervised contact with anyone under 18 unless accompanied by a parent or guardian. The restrictions did not apply to unavoidable contact in public places. The police confiscated Marsh’s mobile phone, which was subsequently destroyed as part of the case proceedings.