ANDREW FILER FROM BISHOP SUTTON ESCAPES JAIL AFTER MOLESTATION INCIDENT INVOLVING SIX-YEAR-OLD BOY
| Red Rose Database
Bishop Sutton Child Sexual Abuser
In a case that has shocked the community of Bishop Sutton, Andrew Filer, a 48-year-old man with a history of working as a babysitter, was recently spared a prison sentence despite admitting to serious sexual misconduct involving a young child. The incident took place in December 2009, when Filer was entrusted with caring for a six-year-old boy whose parents had stepped out of the family home.
According to court proceedings, Filer, who resides on Bonhill Road in Bishop Sutton, stayed overnight at the child's residence. The following morning, shortly after Filer had left, the young boy confided in his parents that he had been touched inappropriately. This revelation prompted immediate concern and subsequent police intervention.
It was revealed during the trial that Filer, who has no prior criminal record, had previously babysat the boy without incident. However, the situation changed when police arrested him the day after the disclosure. Prosecutor Ian Dixey stated that Filer admitted to pulling down the boy’s trousers and engaging in sexual activity with him for approximately ten minutes. Filer, who lives with his mother, did not contest the charges and pleaded guilty to four counts of sexual activity with a child.
Following his admission, Filer was sentenced by Gloucester Crown Court to a two-year community order that includes supervision. Additionally, he was disqualified indefinitely from working with children and was ordered to register as a sex offender for the next five years. The court heard that Filer has been employed in the same job for 27 years, despite his learning difficulties and an IQ of only 59, which is significantly below the average IQ of 100.
Defending Filer, lawyer Anna Vigars, emphasized his long-term employment stability and his learning disabilities, which she argued should be taken into account. The presiding judge, William Hart, acknowledged the severity of Filer’s actions but explained that, given his previous good record, low IQ, and learning difficulties, a custodial sentence was not deemed necessary.
Judge Hart also highlighted the trust placed in Filer by the family who had asked him to babysit, stating that they had “absolutely no reason not to” rely on him. He made it clear that the family should not be criticized for their decision. The judge concluded by warning Filer that anyone who comes into contact with him in the future will now be aware of the potential danger he poses, emphasizing the importance of community safety and awareness.
According to court proceedings, Filer, who resides on Bonhill Road in Bishop Sutton, stayed overnight at the child's residence. The following morning, shortly after Filer had left, the young boy confided in his parents that he had been touched inappropriately. This revelation prompted immediate concern and subsequent police intervention.
It was revealed during the trial that Filer, who has no prior criminal record, had previously babysat the boy without incident. However, the situation changed when police arrested him the day after the disclosure. Prosecutor Ian Dixey stated that Filer admitted to pulling down the boy’s trousers and engaging in sexual activity with him for approximately ten minutes. Filer, who lives with his mother, did not contest the charges and pleaded guilty to four counts of sexual activity with a child.
Following his admission, Filer was sentenced by Gloucester Crown Court to a two-year community order that includes supervision. Additionally, he was disqualified indefinitely from working with children and was ordered to register as a sex offender for the next five years. The court heard that Filer has been employed in the same job for 27 years, despite his learning difficulties and an IQ of only 59, which is significantly below the average IQ of 100.
Defending Filer, lawyer Anna Vigars, emphasized his long-term employment stability and his learning disabilities, which she argued should be taken into account. The presiding judge, William Hart, acknowledged the severity of Filer’s actions but explained that, given his previous good record, low IQ, and learning difficulties, a custodial sentence was not deemed necessary.
Judge Hart also highlighted the trust placed in Filer by the family who had asked him to babysit, stating that they had “absolutely no reason not to” rely on him. He made it clear that the family should not be criticized for their decision. The judge concluded by warning Filer that anyone who comes into contact with him in the future will now be aware of the potential danger he poses, emphasizing the importance of community safety and awareness.