Andrew Dalzell's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to Andrew Dalzell?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
WAKEFIELD MAN AND OTHERS INVOLVED IN CHILD PORNOGRAPHY CASES DURING OPERATION ORE IN WEST YORKSHIRE
In a disturbing case linked to the international Operation Ore investigation into internet child abuse, Andrew Dalzell, a 26-year-old resident of Wakefield, found himself at the center of a criminal inquiry after police uncovered a significant collection of indecent images on his personal computer equipment.The incident unfolded early on December 2 of the previous year, when law enforcement officers executed a search warrant at Dalzell's home on Regina Crescent, Havercroft, Wakefield. During the raid, authorities seized a computer tower, a hard drive, 59 compact discs, and 11 floppy disks. These items were subsequently subjected to detailed analysis, which revealed the presence of 220 indecent images depicting children.
The images included photographs of boys and girls, estimated to be between four and 14 years old, captured in various settings such as beaches, holiday resorts, and possibly a nudist camp. Prosecutor Zafar Siddique explained that some photographs appeared to be taken at locations consistent with naturist environments, aligning with Dalzell's claimed interest in naturism, which he stated was driven by curiosity.
During court proceedings, Dalzell, of Regina Crescent, Havercroft, Wakefield, pleaded guilty to 14 charges of possessing indecent images of children. Magistrates sentenced him to a fine of £600, ordered him to pay £40 in costs, and mandated that he register as a sex offender for five years.
The court was informed that Dalzell, who had previously maintained a good character, had been employed by the same company since leaving school nine years prior, eventually rising to a managerial position. His employment did not involve contact with children, and his actions appeared to stem from personal curiosity rather than any professional misconduct.
His solicitor, Mark Mangano, explained that Dalzell's interest in naturism led him to view and download the images on his computer. Once he realized that possessing such material was illegal, he took steps to delete the images, although experts could still trace their existence. The material was classified as Level One, the lowest of five levels of indecency classification.
Mr. Mangano emphasized that Dalzell expressed remorse during police interviews, acknowledging that his actions had brought shame upon himself and his fiancée, with whom he resides at his grandfather's house. Dalzell agreed to pay the fine and costs using his credit card, and the seized equipment was ordered to be destroyed.
In addition to Dalzell's case, two other men from West Yorkshire appeared before Dewsbury Magistrates Court, both charged in connection with Operation Ore. Both pleaded guilty and were committed to Leeds Crown Court for sentencing at a later date.
Craig Wilmore, aged 27, of Wallingford Mount, Allerton, Bradford, admitted to 20 charges related to possessing indecent images of children. The charges corresponded to 575 images found on his computer, including 10 pictures classified as Level Three and 10 video clips at Levels Four and Five. Wilmore's name appeared on a list provided to West Yorkshire Police, indicating he had used a credit card to access child pornography from an American website.
Meanwhile, David Green, aged 45, of Beech Grove, Kingsley, Pontefract, also pleaded guilty to 20 counts of possessing indecent images of children. Police raided his residence on December 2 of the previous year, seizing his computer equipment, which analysis revealed contained 580 pornographic images involving children, ranging from infants to children around ten years old. Green had a prior conviction for indecent exposure, adding to the seriousness of his case.
Magistrate Nan Chadwick warned both Green and Wilmore that the severity of their offenses warranted sentences beyond the magistrates' usual authority, indicating that they should expect more substantial penalties when their cases are heard at Leeds Crown Court.