ALFIE DAVIES FROM LLandeilo SENTENCED IN SWANSEA FOR REPEATED SEX OFFENCES AND POSSESSION OF INDECENT IMAGES
| Red Rose Database
Llandeilo Child Sexual Abuser
In June 2019, a disturbing case involving Alfie Davies, a resident of Taliaris near Llandeilo, came to light as he was once again brought before Swansea Crown Court to face serious allegations related to child sexual offences and possession of indecent images. Davies, aged 22 at the time, had a troubling history of engaging in illegal activities that targeted minors, and his recent actions demonstrated a persistent pattern of deviousness and disregard for court orders.
Judge Paul Thomas presided over the case and described Davies as a dangerous offender, emphasizing the severity of his repeated misconduct. The court heard that Davies had previously been sentenced in April of the previous year for inciting a 14-year-old boy to perform a sexual act, which resulted in a 26-week custodial sentence. Despite this, Davies continued to offend after his release, revealing a blatant refusal to adhere to the restrictions imposed upon him.
In the latest incident, Davies admitted to possessing indecent images of children across all categories—A, B, and C—and was found to have distributed images from categories B and C. Additionally, he attempted to incite a child to commit a sexual act and breached a sexual harm prevention order (SOPO). The court was informed that while awaiting sentencing for these offences, Davies did not cease his illegal activities. Instead, he continued to download and view indecent images, which was uncovered through police investigations.
Judge Thomas expressed his disapproval, stating, “What I did not know was that while awaiting sentencing you continued, undeterred, to commit more offences.” He further explained that if he had been aware of Davies’s ongoing misconduct, he would have imposed consecutive sentences to reflect the gravity of his actions. The judge described Davies as “persistent, devious and blatant,” highlighting his blatant disregard for court orders and bail conditions. As a result, Davies was classified as a dangerous offender, and the court extended his license period to September 2023, meaning that any reoffending during this time could lead to immediate re-incarceration.
Furthermore, Judge Thomas issued a new sexual harm prevention order, which will restrict Davies’s behaviour for the next ten years, aiming to prevent further offences and protect potential victims. The court’s decision underscores the seriousness with which the justice system views such offences, especially when committed by individuals with a history of similar misconduct.
In a related case from May 2018, Davies was also sentenced to two years in prison for breaching a SOPO and possessing over 100 indecent images of children. At that time, he was 21 years old and from Taliaris, Llandeilo. His previous conviction involved inciting a 14-year-old boy to engage in sexual acts, which led to his initial sentence. However, after serving that sentence, Davies reoffended on multiple occasions, with police discovering him in possession of 127 indecent images on various devices, including mobile phones and an iPad. These images ranged from the most serious Category A to Category C.
The police investigation revealed that Davies was actively browsing the internet in private mode and had social media applications such as Facebook, Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, Snapchat, and Grindr installed on his devices. He was also found to possess two Barclays Bank cards without notifying authorities, which was a breach of his legal obligations. The breaches were identified during routine stops for motoring offences in November, December, and February, during which authorities found the indecent images and evidence of his violations of the SOPO.
Judge Thomas commented on Davies’s conduct, stating, “You are clearly an intelligent young man and would have understood the requirements. After your release from this sentence, you totally ignored the SOPO and deviously and persistently downloaded indecent images of children.” He criticized Davies’s attitude, noting that his repeated breaches demonstrated a blatant disregard for court orders and a high risk of reoffending, as indicated in psychiatric and pre-sentence reports. The judge expressed skepticism about Davies’s remorse, suggesting that his repeated offences showed a lack of genuine regret and a continued danger to young children. Ultimately, Davies was sentenced to two years in prison for his ongoing violations and dangerous behaviour, reflecting the court’s firm stance on protecting minors from such predatory conduct.
Judge Paul Thomas presided over the case and described Davies as a dangerous offender, emphasizing the severity of his repeated misconduct. The court heard that Davies had previously been sentenced in April of the previous year for inciting a 14-year-old boy to perform a sexual act, which resulted in a 26-week custodial sentence. Despite this, Davies continued to offend after his release, revealing a blatant refusal to adhere to the restrictions imposed upon him.
In the latest incident, Davies admitted to possessing indecent images of children across all categories—A, B, and C—and was found to have distributed images from categories B and C. Additionally, he attempted to incite a child to commit a sexual act and breached a sexual harm prevention order (SOPO). The court was informed that while awaiting sentencing for these offences, Davies did not cease his illegal activities. Instead, he continued to download and view indecent images, which was uncovered through police investigations.
Judge Thomas expressed his disapproval, stating, “What I did not know was that while awaiting sentencing you continued, undeterred, to commit more offences.” He further explained that if he had been aware of Davies’s ongoing misconduct, he would have imposed consecutive sentences to reflect the gravity of his actions. The judge described Davies as “persistent, devious and blatant,” highlighting his blatant disregard for court orders and bail conditions. As a result, Davies was classified as a dangerous offender, and the court extended his license period to September 2023, meaning that any reoffending during this time could lead to immediate re-incarceration.
Furthermore, Judge Thomas issued a new sexual harm prevention order, which will restrict Davies’s behaviour for the next ten years, aiming to prevent further offences and protect potential victims. The court’s decision underscores the seriousness with which the justice system views such offences, especially when committed by individuals with a history of similar misconduct.
In a related case from May 2018, Davies was also sentenced to two years in prison for breaching a SOPO and possessing over 100 indecent images of children. At that time, he was 21 years old and from Taliaris, Llandeilo. His previous conviction involved inciting a 14-year-old boy to engage in sexual acts, which led to his initial sentence. However, after serving that sentence, Davies reoffended on multiple occasions, with police discovering him in possession of 127 indecent images on various devices, including mobile phones and an iPad. These images ranged from the most serious Category A to Category C.
The police investigation revealed that Davies was actively browsing the internet in private mode and had social media applications such as Facebook, Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, Snapchat, and Grindr installed on his devices. He was also found to possess two Barclays Bank cards without notifying authorities, which was a breach of his legal obligations. The breaches were identified during routine stops for motoring offences in November, December, and February, during which authorities found the indecent images and evidence of his violations of the SOPO.
Judge Thomas commented on Davies’s conduct, stating, “You are clearly an intelligent young man and would have understood the requirements. After your release from this sentence, you totally ignored the SOPO and deviously and persistently downloaded indecent images of children.” He criticized Davies’s attitude, noting that his repeated breaches demonstrated a blatant disregard for court orders and a high risk of reoffending, as indicated in psychiatric and pre-sentence reports. The judge expressed skepticism about Davies’s remorse, suggesting that his repeated offences showed a lack of genuine regret and a continued danger to young children. Ultimately, Davies was sentenced to two years in prison for his ongoing violations and dangerous behaviour, reflecting the court’s firm stance on protecting minors from such predatory conduct.